- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:29:53 +0200
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
We have had had a request http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0119.html to delete an unused namespace declaration from test SymmetricProperty 001. [[ besides the fact that the namespace 'second' is not used, ]] The discussion in this thread minds me to argue for not accepting this request (at least not in full generality), but rather to deliberately leave (at least some) usused namespace declarations in the test cases: where they have no effect. (Probably unlike the test highlighted by the commentator http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/byFunction#function-SymmetricProperty it would be more to the point to include them in negative entailment tests for which Dan's reading of namespaces would result in the entailment). From http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ftf2.html [[ RESOLUTION: The meaning of an OWL document is conveyed in the RDF graph ==> ALL in favour, NO opposed RESOLUTION: All RDF/XML documents that are equivalent under the RDF Recommendation are equivalent OWL exchange documents ==> 14 in favor -- 3 opposed RESOLUTION: The exchange language for OWL is RDF/XML ==> 16 in favour ]] not one word about xmlns:foo being significant. Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 04:30:08 UTC