5.11 hasClass/toClass names
RDFCORE: construct for closed lists
AW: RDFS review (was re: LOG WebOnt Telcon May 30th (Draft))
3rd Call for Papers: EON2002
Dark triples are not inherently nonmonotonic
pls fill out registration form by 21Jun, even to offer regrets
Dark triples are inherently nonmonotonic (from Pat Hayes & R.Guha)
ISSUE: XML presentation syntax
LOG WebOnt Telcon May 30th (Draft)
DTTF: summary
LANG: official version of full language features document
DTTF: Re: AGENDA (update): May 30 telecon
TEST: sameClassAs testcase
AGENDA (update): May 30 telecon
An XML ``presentation'' syntax for OWL
4.5 InverseOf: a test case for mapping between ontologies]
DTTF: darkest africa
layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory
layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory
- Re: layering (5.3,5.10): a same-syntax model theory
Proposal that Issue 3.3 (Daml:DisjointFrom) be eradicated from the issues list
Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty
Issue 3.1 - Local Restrictions
OPEN Issue 2.5 - Closed Sets (daml:List, daml:Collection)
Issue 2.4 - Enumerated Classes (daml:oneOf)
Issue 2.2 - Adding properties to someone else's instances
- Re: Issue 2.2 - Adding properties to someone else's instances
- Re: Issue 2.2 - Adding properties to someone else's instances
Issue 2.1: URI naming of Instances
WOWG ADMIN IMPORTANT: Issue list: cleanup of ISSUES 2.1-3.4
WARNING: W3C Scheduled Power Outage 31 May - 1 June
AGENDA: May 30 telecon
4.6 EquivalentTo issue
Regrets for 2002-05-30 telecon
Regrets July f2f
DDTF/layering: weak class theory seems good enough (5.3, 5.10)
- RE: DDTF/layering: weak class theory seems good enough (5.3, 5.10)
4.5 InverseOf: a test case for mapping between ontologies
- Re: 4.5 InverseOf: a test case for mapping between ontologies
- Re: 4.5 InverseOf: a test case for mapping between ontologies
An XML ``presentation'' syntax for OWL
DTTF: summary 5/27/2002 for review
ISSUES: 4.5, 5..11, 4.6 opened
AID'02 Workshop
update to the compliance document
minutes of EU/US Joint committee
iswc meeting proposal on webont language documents
pls register for WebOnt ftf3, 1-2 Jun in Stanford
regrets for may 28, june 4, question on june 11
ADMIN: Telecon regrets May 30, June 6
23 May WebOnt teleconference minutes for review
5/23 Belated Regrets
Issue: compliance level 1 position with respect to rdf
Issue: Feature decision for compliance level 1: cardinality restrictions
Issue: Feature decision for compliance level 1: local range restrictions
DTTF: How unasserted triples help
- Re: DTTF: How unasserted triples help
- Re: DTTF: How unasserted triples help
- RE: DTTF: How unasserted triples help
RE: ADMIN: pointers to useful WebOnt information from the WebOnt home page
MISC: Response to RDF Core re: RDF Schema
ISSUE: Ontology versioning
LANG: new version of 2nd face-to-face full language document
ADMIN: pointers to useful WebOnt information from the WebOnt home page
MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
May 23rd telecon regrets
DTTF: summary (gasp!)
- RE: DTTF: summary (gasp!)
- Re: DTTF: summary (gasp!)
- Re: DTTF: summary (gasp!)
- RE: DTTF: summary (gasp!)
- RE: DTTF: summary (gasp!)
ADMIN: Agenda for May 23rd Telecon
More on a UML based presentation syntax for OWL
- Re: More on a UML based presentation syntax for OWL
- Re: More on a UML based presentation syntax for OWL
Re: A derivation of a contradiction from the Russell set (was Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak)
ISSUE: Entailing inconsistencies
ISSUE: hasClass/toClass
ADMIN: Log of May 16 WEBONT Telecon
SEM: OWL issues affecting OWL semantics
ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak
- Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak
- Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak
- Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak
- Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak
- Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak
- Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak
- Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak
- Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak
- Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak
- Re: ISSUE: DAML+OIL semantics is too weak
ISSUE: Malformed DAML+OIL Restrictions
- Re: ISSUE: Malformed DAML+OIL Restrictions
- RE: ISSUE: Malformed DAML+OIL Restrictions
- RE: ISSUE: Malformed DAML+OIL Restrictions
ISSUE: Datatypes
regrets for 5/16 telecon
WOWG: Ontology awareness increasing
Regrets for 5/16
Chairs and webont email problems
AGENDA: May 16 telecon
Guide/Lang: UML as a presentation syntax for OWL
- Re: Guide/Lang: UML as a presentation syntax for OWL
- Re: Guide/Lang: UML as a presentation syntax for OWL
- Re: Guide/Lang: UML as a presentation syntax for OWL
regrets 16th May telecon
On UML as a presentation syntax for OWL
- Re: On UML as a presentation syntax for OWL
- Re: On UML as a presentation syntax for OWL
- Re: On UML as a presentation syntax for OWL
- Re: On UML as a presentation syntax for OWL
DTTF: Embracing the dark side
Regrets for 5/16
Compliance Level 1 Proposal
- Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal
- Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal
- Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal
- Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal
- Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal
- RE: Compliance Level 1 Proposal
- Re: Compliance Level 1 Proposal
Regrets for 16-May
LANG/GUIDE: Thought on compliance levels and WG goals (Sem/test please read too)
WOWG: Presentation at WWW 2002 on Web Ont WG
Regrets
DTTF: Can 'semantically closed' languages be extended?
ISSUE: daml:imports as magic syntax
Semantic Web article in today's Financial Times
ISSUE: range restrictions should not be separate URIs
FYI: WebOnt on xml.com
DTTF: comprehension
DTTF: another summary
- a problem with comprehensive entailments
- Re: DTTF: another summary
- RE: DTTF: another summary
circular paradox gizmo
ISSUE: List syntax or semantics
RE: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (sameState TEST)
regrets for a few weeks
Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (sameState TEST)
LANG: number range expressions
syntactic restrictions on RDF graphs
Regrets
DTTF: high-level summary (attempt)
RE: DTTF: List Ontology test case
Regrets - May 2 telecon
Stanton - Regrets - May 2 Teleconference
Stanton - Regrets Telecom May 2
Re: Ann: Web Services Architecture Requirements published (fwd)
New RDF Core Working Drafts published
Lang Compliance and Tomorrow's telecon
Re: LANG: compliance levels
- Re: LANG: compliance levels (VOTE on local range restrictions)
- Re: LANG: compliance levels
- Re: LANG: compliance levels
ADMIN: Updated WOWG Telecon Agenda, May 2
- Re: ADMIN: Updated WOWG Telecon Agenda, May 2
- GUIDE: UML presentation syntax reviews? [was: Telecon Agenda, May 2]
- Re: ADMIN: Updated WOWG Telecon Agenda, May 2
- 2 May WebOnt telcon minutes for review [was: Updated WOWG Telecon Agenda]