W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2002

Re: DTTF: summary (gasp!)

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 12:02:21 -0400
Message-ID: <004f01c201aa$0ed71540$0a2e249b@nemc.org>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

> Good summary!


> My only quibble is with the editorial comment at the very end.

yes, well I ran out of steam at the end, so this is not entirely explained.

what I would prefer is a mechanism to direct that specific predicates or
perhaps namespaces (but namespaces are tricky because RDF concats namespace
with localname to form URI, so it would be a URI ref -prefix- ) would be
unasserted i.e. used for syntactic purposes i.e. "dark".

the syntactic devices e.g. embedding an <rdf:RDF> within which everything is
unasserted by default, would work except that the resulting OWL would be
littered with these funny <rdf:RDF>s all over the place, so the idea of
stating which predicates are "dark" in an RDF Schema -- or OWL ontology --
is more attractive.

wording changes/paragraph inclusions are always welcome.

Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 12:06:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:30 UTC