- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 09:05:56 -0400
- To: "Deborah McGuinness" <dlm@KSL.Stanford.EDU>
- Cc: "Enrico Motta" <e.motta@open.ac.uk>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Deborah McGuinness wrote: > Correct - local restrictions can be used to express global restrictions as you > state. > that is not the issue under discussion - it is universally qualified local > restrictions vs. existentially qualified local restrictions. Ok. I recall seeing something suggesting that Level 1 have only global restrictions, and I would say the opposite (regardless of what RDFS does). Ian's argument makes sense: if we have only existential or universal, then existential seems to be the way to go -- on the other hand I fear that I am still sorting out existential, universal and the "Q"s, so perhaps it is premature to decide this seemingly straightforward issue. Jonathan
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2002 20:52:24 UTC