Proposal that Issue 3.3 (Daml:DisjointFrom) be eradicated from the issues list

Issue 3.3 - daml:disjointFrom

Although it is generally considered a bad idea to remove issues from 
the issue list once they've been raised, in this case I believe we 
should make an exception.  In particular, daml:disjointFrom does not 
appear in the DAML+OIL Note [1] and it appears that disjointness is a 
required functionality for OWL.

[note - if someone wishes to raise this issue - please submit an 
issue writeup for this]


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oil-reference

p.s. Apologies for strange title of this email - the word "remove" 
cannot be used in the subject or the W3C software tries to 
unsubscribe one from the list.

-- 
Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  240-731-3822 (Cell)
http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler

Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 22:59:44 UTC