Issue 3.3 - daml:disjointFrom Although it is generally considered a bad idea to remove issues from the issue list once they've been raised, in this case I believe we should make an exception. In particular, daml:disjointFrom does not appear in the DAML+OIL Note [1] and it appears that disjointness is a required functionality for OWL. [note - if someone wishes to raise this issue - please submit an issue writeup for this] [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oil-reference p.s. Apologies for strange title of this email - the word "remove" cannot be used in the subject or the W3C software tries to unsubscribe one from the list. -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 240-731-3822 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendlerReceived on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 22:59:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:30 UTC