Jim, I was responding to this message: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002May/0302.html It does raise a valid criticism of the approach that I had initially favored, and WebOnt needs to remain aware of these issues, because the solution affects the syntax of our exchange language. Jonathan > > John - w/due respect, did you mean this for WOWG or for RDF-logic, > which is where that was posted. > -JH >Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 19:56:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:30 UTC