- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 19:24:03 -0400
- To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
> > It seems to me that if we substitute "CE" for "PE" in, for example, Nagel's > "Godel's Proof" -- which is a relatively nontechnical read, then "CE" may > indeed be stuck with the same essential problem as "PM". > That should be: "It seems to me that if we substitute "CE" for "PM" ..."
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 19:28:47 UTC