- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 30 May 2002 09:19:10 -0500
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 21:42, Jim Hendler wrote: > > Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty > > Proposal - CLOSE THIS ISSUE > > The issue here was that the requirements document didn't motivate > this language feature. I think we discovered that's a mistake. It's called 'Cardinality constraints' in the requirements document. http://www.w3.org/TR/webont-req/#section-requirements I'd support changing the requirements document to say that we really need maxCardinality 1 (and 2 and 0, maybe), and lots of others look useful. > However, no one has advocated its removal and > there does seem to be consensus it is a desirable feature. It is > provided for in DAML+OIL and will be provided in OWL. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 10:19:30 UTC