On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 21:42, Jim Hendler wrote: > > Issue 3.4 - daml:UnambiguousProperty > > Proposal - CLOSE THIS ISSUE > > The issue here was that the requirements document didn't motivate > this language feature. I think we discovered that's a mistake. It's called 'Cardinality constraints' in the requirements document. http://www.w3.org/TR/webont-req/#section-requirements I'd support changing the requirements document to say that we really need maxCardinality 1 (and 2 and 0, maybe), and lots of others look useful. > However, no one has advocated its removal and > there does seem to be consensus it is a desirable feature. It is > provided for in DAML+OIL and will be provided in OWL. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 10:19:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:30 UTC