- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 13:14:14 -0400
- To: "WebOnt WG" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Jos, > > > > Does your use of nested contexts and unasserted triples support the need > > for this mechanism in OWL, as a solution to Peter's most recent paradox? > > (this is turning into the Patel-Schneider paradox -hopefully finite- > > set) > > > > I am reading this as yes, but want to confirm. > > I would say yes > but what is that -hopefully finite- set? > Just a little joke, an _infinite_ set of paradoxes would be a bad thing I imagine -- it would probably take an infinite amount of time to resolve :-)) Jonathan
Received on Monday, 6 May 2002 13:18:17 UTC