W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2002

Re: DTTF: summary (gasp!)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 22 May 2002 11:09:15 -0500
To: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Cc: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1022083755.11068.245.camel@dirk>
Thanks for the summary, but I need a bit more
before I can decide anything...

On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 00:10, Jonathan Borden wrote:
> 1) a syntactic device such as contexts e.g. embedded <rdf:RDF> or <rdf:context> or <rdf:dark> 
> ****2) an RDFS based device such as http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Apr/0290.html
> -- this is my preference and would (IMHO) require the least change to RDF

OK, now, suppose we (RDF Core, WebOnt, whoever) adopted that solution.

How does it relate to the problem?

Please show how applying it, e.g. to the Employee/Student
test case (or any of the other sticky cases), works out.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 12:09:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:30 UTC