- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 22 May 2002 11:09:15 -0500
- To: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Cc: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Thanks for the summary, but I need a bit more before I can decide anything... On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 00:10, Jonathan Borden wrote: [...] > 1) a syntactic device such as contexts e.g. embedded <rdf:RDF> or <rdf:context> or <rdf:dark> > > ****2) an RDFS based device such as http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Apr/0290.html > > -- this is my preference and would (IMHO) require the least change to RDF OK, now, suppose we (RDF Core, WebOnt, whoever) adopted that solution. How does it relate to the problem? Please show how applying it, e.g. to the Employee/Student test case (or any of the other sticky cases), works out. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 12:09:12 UTC