- From: Deborah McGuinness <dlm@KSL.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 12:38:42 -0700
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
sorry - that was my mistake. I left in the notion of primitive (as distinguished from defined classes). I will modify the compliance level spec to read just class where primitiveClass was mentioned. It is consistent with our notion of class in daml+oil (of course only using the features of the compliance level 1 language). so it contains 0 or more subClassOf elements and 0 or more sameClassAs elements deborah Dan Connolly wrote: > On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 00:14, Deborah McGuinness wrote: > > At the last telecon, I took the action item to produce a compliance > > level 1 document by today. > > The document is available at: > > http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/webont/compliance.html > lst modified: Tue, 14 May 2002 22:15:40 GMT > > "The expanded summary listing of this proposal includes: > > * RDF Schema features > primitiveclass" > > I don't understand what "primitiveclass" refers to in > the context of RDFS. Please explain. > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ -- Deborah L. McGuinness Knowledge Systems Laboratory Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020 email: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu URL: http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm (voice) 650 723 9770 (stanford fax) 650 725 5850 (computer fax) 801 705 0941
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2002 16:11:37 UTC