www-rdf-interest@w3.org from November 2003 by date

Friday, 28 November 2003

• Fwd: Re: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter: Add Embedding RDF in XHTML Adrian Walker
• Re: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter: Add Embedding RDF in XHTML Ralph R. Swick
• Re: "valid" RDF in XML files jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: "valid" RDF in XML files Thomas B. Passin
• [ANN] 3store 2.2.13 Steve Harris
• "valid" RDF in XML files elacazed
• MGET & machine proc - spinoff thread Wingnut
• Re: MGET and machine processing Patrick Stickler

Thursday, 27 November 2003

• Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: eRQL Karsten Tolle
• Re: Semantic Web forms for 2nd phase? Mark Baker
• RE: MGET and machine processing Seaborne, Andy
• SKOS and OWL - set based constructs Miles, AJ (Alistair)
• ANNOUNCEMENT: eRQL Karsten Tolle
• RE: Semantic Web forms for 2nd phase? Leo Sauermann
• Fwd: Nokia's comments on RDF Query Charter (v1.21) Patrick Stickler
• Re: MGET and machine processing Patrick Stickler
• RE: RDF Schema Leo Sauermann
• Semantic Web forms for 2nd phase? Mark Baker
• Re: RDF Schema Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 26 November 2003

• Re: *****SPAM***** Re: plain rules, please / possibly simplistic approach Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: plain rules, please / possibly simplistic approach Adrian Walker
• Re: Implicit types in RDF Forms Jan Algermissen
• RDF Schema frozados@fibertel.com.ar
• SKOS-Mapping comments and labels added Miles, AJ (Alistair)
• Implicit types in RDF Forms Mark Baker
• SKOS-Core comments and labels added Miles, AJ (Alistair)
• URI Identity Crisis Redux [was: Re: Representing things RE: RDF and speech acts] jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: Re: MGET and machine processing jalgermissen@topicmapping.com
• Re: RDF presentation framework Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF and speech acts Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF presentation framework Jeen Broekstra
• Re: MGET and machine processing Patrick Stickler
• Re: MGET and machine processing Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF presentation framework Adam Souzis

Monday, 24 November 2003

• Re: Why Rdf? Graham Klyne

Wednesday, 26 November 2003

• RE: RDF presentation framework Leo Sauermann
• RDF presentation framework Michael Dai
• Re: MGET and machine processing Mark Baker

Tuesday, 25 November 2003

• Re: MGET and machine processing Jos De_Roo
• Re: MGET and machine processing Patrick Stickler
• Re: Representing things RE: RDF and speech acts Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: MGET and machine processing Jan Algermissen
• Re: Are MGET descriptions workable/necessary? Patrick Stickler
• Re: Representing things RE: RDF and speech acts jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: Are MGET descriptions workable/necessary? Patrick Stickler
• Re: MGET and machine processing Patrick Stickler
• Representing things RE: RDF and speech acts Charles McCathieNevile
• XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation Edd Dumbill
• RDF schemas for thesauri and simple KOS *pre-release* Miles, AJ (Alistair)

Monday, 24 November 2003

• RE: Are MGET descriptions workable/necessary? Phil Dawes

Tuesday, 25 November 2003

• RE: RDF and speech acts Leo Sauermann
• RE: ANNOUNCE - SchemaWeb Victor Lindesay
• RE: Put/Get - RDF Net API Graham Moore
• Re: Asunto: Re: Why Rdf? Charles McCathieNevile
• RDF and speech acts Garret Wilson
• RE: Why Rdf? Charles McCathieNevile

Monday, 24 November 2003

• RE: Are MGET descriptions workable/necessary? Joshua Allen
• Re: Are MGET descriptions workable/necessary? Phil Dawes
• RE: Why Rdf? Leo Sauermann
• Re: Shirky / Syllogisms / Semantic Web Adrian Walker

Sunday, 23 November 2003

• Re: Are MGET descriptions workable/necessary? Phil Dawes

Monday, 24 November 2003

• ANN: RAP - RDF API for PHP V0.7 Chris Bizer

Sunday, 23 November 2003

• Re: Are MGET descriptions workable/necessary? Phil Dawes

Monday, 24 November 2003

• Asunto: Re: Why Rdf? frozados@fibertel.com.ar
• Re: Are MGET descriptions workable/necessary? Patrick Stickler
• Re: Are MGET descriptions workable/necessary? Patrick Stickler
• Re: MGET and machine processing Patrick Stickler
• RE: Why Rdf? Federico Rozados
• Re: MGET and machine processing Mark Baker
• Re: MGET and machine processing Patrick Stickler
• Re: Why Rdf? Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 23 November 2003

• Why Rdf? Federico Rozados
• Re: MGET and machine processing Mark Baker
• Re: MGET and machine processing Jos De_Roo
• Re: Are MGET descriptions workable/necessary? Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Patrick Stickler
• Re: MGET and machine processing Patrick Stickler

Saturday, 22 November 2003

• "XML Encryption Syntax and Processing" and RDF Garret Wilson
• about Spectacle problems Michael Dai

Friday, 21 November 2003

• Are MGET descriptions workable/necessary? Phil Dawes
• Re: MGET and machine processing Mark Baker
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Danny Ayers
• Re: MGET and machine processing Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Patrick Stickler
• Re: WordNet and Concepts Libby Miller
• RE: WordNet and Concepts Bradley P. Allen
• ANN: Sesame release 0.97 and Rio release 0.97 Jeen Broekstra
• MGET and machine processing Mark Baker
• WordNet and Concepts Leo Sauermann
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Danny Ayers
• RE: Put/Get (was RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents) Danny Ayers
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Patrick Stickler
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Patrick Stickler
• Second Call for Papers: RIAO 2004 - 26-28 avril, 2004 cfp@riao.org

Thursday, 20 November 2003

• Put/Get (was RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents) Jim Hendler
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Mark Baker
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Joshua Allen
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Danny Ayers
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Danny Ayers
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Joshua Allen
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Danny Ayers
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Mark Baker
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Bill de hÓra
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Bill de hÓra
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Mark Baker
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Danny Ayers
• Re: ANNOUNCE - SchemaWeb Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Bill de hÓra
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Bill de hÓra
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Patrick Stickler
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Danny Ayers
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Bill de hÓra
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents NMP-MSW/Tampere
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents NMP-MSW/Tampere
• RE: Quickie ? Leo Sauermann

Wednesday, 19 November 2003

• Re: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion Paul Denning
• Re: UDDI + RDF = ? Max Voskob
• RE: ANNOUNCE - SchemaWeb Victor Lindesay
• Quickie ? Rhoads, Stephen
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Aredridel
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Danny Ayers
• Re: ANNOUNCE - SchemaWeb Thomas B. Passin

Tuesday, 18 November 2003

• Semantic Web Best Practices WG Charter Mary Pulvermacher

Wednesday, 19 November 2003

• RE: ANNOUNCE - SchemaWeb Pete Johnston
• Re: ANNOUNCE - SchemaWeb Dave Beckett
• RE: ANNOUNCE - SchemaWeb Leo Sauermann
• ebXML Registry and RDF (was Re: UDDI + RDF = ?) Farrukh Najmi
• Re: ANNOUNCE - SchemaWeb Graham Klyne
• ANNOUNCE - SchemaWeb Victor Lindesay
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents NMP-MSW/Tampere
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents NMP-MSW/Tampere
• Re: UDDI + RDF = ? Dan Brickley
• UDDI + RDF = ? Max Voskob

Tuesday, 18 November 2003

• Re: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion Leo Sauermann
• Re: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion Guus Schreiber
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Danny Ayers
• Re: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion Guus Schreiber
• Re: Semantic Web Best Practices Guus Schreiber
• Re: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion Guus Schreiber
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Mark Baker
• SWAD-Europe Thesaurus Activity - new site Miles, AJ (Alistair)
• Re: Towards an RDF Query standard: some proposed minimum requirements NMP-MSW/Tampere
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents NMP-MSW/Tampere
• Towards an RDF Query standard: some proposed minimum requirements NMP-MSW/Tampere
• ANNOUNCEMENT: RDF-S3 Karsten Tolle
• Re: Non-monotonic Andrei Lopatenko

Monday, 17 November 2003

• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Danny Ayers

Sunday, 16 November 2003

• Re: [Sesame-devel] Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language NMP-MSW/Tampere

Saturday, 15 November 2003

• Re: Collections vs Containers David Menendez

Friday, 14 November 2003

• RE: Non-monotonic Stephane Fellah
• Re: Non-monotonic Adrian Walker
• Re: Non-monotonic Drew McDermott
• Re: [Sesame-devel] Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Arjohn Kampman
• Re: Non-monotonic Sean Mehan
• Re: Collections vs Containers Karsten Tolle
• RE: Non-monotonic Minsu Jang
• Re: Non-monotonic Thomas B. Passin

Thursday, 13 November 2003

• Re: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Damian Steer
• Re: Non-monotonic Adrian Walker
• Re: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion Frank Manola
• Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Patrick Stickler
• FW: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 12 November 2003

• Re: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion Libby Miller
• Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Jeen Broekstra
• RE: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Arjohn Kampman
• Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Jeen Broekstra
• Re: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion Guus Schreiber
• RE: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Graham Klyne
• Re: Collections vs Containers Graham Klyne
• Re: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Graham Klyne
• Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Patrick Stickler
• Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol Patrick Stickler
• Re: Collections vs Containers Sandro Hawke
• Collections vs Containers David Menendez
• Re: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 11 November 2003

• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Benjamin Grosof
• Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Steve Harris
• Re: AW: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Jack Berkowitz
• RE: Is Semantic Web possible ? Bill Hutchison
• RE: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol Steve Harris
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Wagner, G.R.
• Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Steve Harris
• Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol Dan Brickley
• AW: RDF query and Rules - my two cents Raphael Volz
• RDF query and Rules - my two cents Jim Hendler
• Re: Is Semantic Web possible ? Chris Goad
• Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
• RE: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Leo Sauermann
• Re: SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion Graham Klyne
• Re: What is the most common type of collection or container? Graham Klyne
• RE: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol Graham Moore
• Re: What is the most common type of collection or container? Patrick Stickler
• Re: What is the most common type of collection or container? Jos De_Roo
• Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
• Re: Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Patrick Stickler
• Re: What is the most common type of collection or container? Patrick Stickler
• Re: What is the most common type of collection or container? Patrick Stickler
• Semantic Web Phase 2 Activity - Protocol - Query Language Leo Sauermann
• Re: Owl Rules and RDF Semantics Drew McDermott
• SW Best Practices WG - draft charter for discussion Guus Schreiber

Monday, 10 November 2003

• Re: What is the most common type of collection or container? Jos De_Roo
• RE: Is Semantic Web possible ? Leo Sauermann
• Re: Is Semantic Web possible ? Andrew Newman
• Re: What is the most common type of collection or container? Sandro Hawke
• Re: Owl Rules and RDF Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Is Semantic Web possible ? Benjamin Nowack
• Re: Is Semantic Web possible ? Dan Brickley
• Is Semantic Web possible ? Stephane Fellah
• Re: What is the most common type of collection or container? Patrick Stickler
• Re: What is the most common type of collection or container? Graham Klyne
• What is the most common type of collection or container? Jimmy
• Web Services WSI2004-CFP Call for Papers Savitri

Friday, 7 November 2003

• Rules WG -- draft charter -- discussion on www-rdf-rules Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF Query -- possible WG charter draft for discussion Dan Brickley
• fwd: RDF Query -- possible WG charter draft for discussion Dan Brickley
• Add: RDF Namespace Resolution Proposal: A Bone for Discussion James Cerra
• RDF Namespace Resolution Proposal: A Bone for Discussion James Cerra
• Re: making statements about a graph Thomas B. Passin

Thursday, 6 November 2003

• Re: RDF Core Test Results: Call For Data Feeds Steve Harris
• Re: Owl Rules and RDF Semantics Drew McDermott
• Re: Owl Rules and RDF Semantics Drew McDermott
• Re: RDF Core Test Results: Call For Data Feeds Jeen Broekstra
• Re: making statements about a graph Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
• Re: making statements about a graph Thomas B. Passin
• Re: making statements about a graph Steve Harris
• Re: making statements about a graph Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
• Re: making statements about a graph Steve Harris
• Re: making statements about a graph Max Froumentin

Wednesday, 5 November 2003

• Re: RDF Core Test Results: Call For Data Feeds Jos De_Roo
• Re: making statements about a graph Steve Harris
• Re: making statements about a graph Steve Harris
• Re: making statements about a graph Dmitry Borodaenko
• Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: RxRDF and Rhizome Adam Souzis
• Re: making statements about a graph Bill de hÓra
• Owl Rules and RDF Semantics Adrian Walker
• Implementing RDF datatype inference Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF Core Test Results: Call For Data Feeds Jos De_Roo
• Re: RDF Core Test Results: Call For Data Feeds Sandy Pan
• RDF Core Test Results: Call For Data Feeds Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 4 November 2003

• Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: RxRDF and Rhizome Adam Souzis
• Re: Fwd: Palm version of schedule Libby Miller
• Re: making statements about a graph Steve Harris
• Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: RxRDF and Rhizome Patrick Stickler
• Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: RxRDF and Rhizome Graham Klyne

Monday, 3 November 2003

• Re: Fwd: Palm version of schedule Graham Klyne
• Re: Fwd: Palm version of schedule Robert Prouse
• making statements about a graph Bill de hÓra
• Fwd: Palm version of schedule Graham Klyne
• RE: ANNOUNCEMENT: RDFStyles: alternative to XSLT for RDF Adam Souzis
• ANNOUNCEMENT: RxRDF and Rhizome Adam Souzis
• Re: some basic ontology problems, need for more explanation Thomas B. Passin
• Re: some basic ontology problems, need for more explanation Adrian Walker
• RE: some basic ontology problems, need for more explanation Chuck Irvine
• some basic ontology problems, need for more explanation Sandy Pan

Last message date: Friday, 28 November 2003 15:13:00 UTC