On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:27:40 +0100, Max Froumentin wrote: > > Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > > > The RDF provided mechaism for reification is pretty messed up IMHO. > > This reminds me that I never saw a clear statement explaining why it > was messed up. I want to use it for voice recognition, to express > confidence values for assertions: > > <utterance id="u1">chat</utterance> > > <rdf:RDF> > <rdf:Resource rdf:nodeID="r1" rdf:about="#u1" dc:language="EN"/> > <rdf:Resource rdf:nodeID="r2" rdf:about="#u1" dc:language="FR"/> > > <rdf:Resource rdf:about="#r1" foo:confidence="65%"/> > <rdf:Resource rdf:about="#r2" foo:confidence="35%"/> > </rdf:RDF> I dont think thats reified (though I'm not that hot on RDF syntax), I think reified statements look something like: <rdf:Statement> <rdf:subject resource="#r1" /> <rdf:predicate resource="foo:confidence" /> <rdf:object>65%</rdf:object> </rdf:Statement> representing one triple. But it doesnt entail the "obvious" triple. IIRC, your exmaples are b-nodes. - SteveReceived on Thursday, 6 November 2003 05:43:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:45 UTC