- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:08:24 -0500 (EST)
- To: Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>
- Cc: 'Garret Wilson' <garret@globalmentor.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hi Leo, actually FOAF doesn't use the same mechanism as WordNet. My understanding of best practice is that a bare URI will often be understood to refer to the thing that gets returned - i.e. the page. So if you want to use the wordnet entry for love, it is better to define some "definition" fragment for all wordnet, such as http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/love-4#defn and this can clearly identify anything you want, but doesn't mean "the page itself". FOAF gets around the desire to do this by using a blank Node to identify a Person - the person whose email address is mailto:foo@example.net Or in RDF <rdf:RDF xmlns="I forget right now" xmlns:foaf="the foaf namespace"> <foaf:Person> <foaf:mbox rdf:resource="mailto:foo@example.net"/> </foaf:Person> </rdf:RDF> I think for foaf:interest it suggests you use a URI though. The indirection trick here is neat in that it is relatively easy to apply: [concept] [described by] [the relevant Wordnet page] but may be a bit clunkier to use. (There's a fair bit of discussion around on this topic...) Cheers Chaals On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Leo Sauermann wrote: > > >I would be interested in that, too. We are missing some philosophical >stuff here. If you find anything, please post it here. > > >I remember the "URI crisis", that tackles the question of "what does a >URI identify?". Especially the problem of "how do i represent love?" > >http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/identitycrisis.html >http://www.w3.org/2002/11/dbooth-names/dbooth-names_clean.htm >http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/HTTP-URI > > > >Here is something cut/n/pasted from my diploma thesis about identifying >general concepts (like "red"): > >A URI can be used to identify an abstract concept. Again we have an >example, the identification of the concept of "love". A solution here >would be to use WordNet identifiers for the meaning of English words, >as Dan Brickley suggested in [Brickley2001]. According to his definition >(and a correction by Libby Miller [Miller2003]), "love" could be >expressed with this URI. > >"http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/love-4". >Figure 6 The "Love" URI > >Some common concepts can be identified with this method, Dan Brickley >and Libby Miller used it to identify the concept of a "person" in their >FOAF, project. [FOAF].
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2003 12:17:33 UTC