- From: Dmitry Borodaenko <d.borodaenko@sam-solutions.net>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 21:43:15 +0200
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 06:13:31PM +0000, Bill de h?ra wrote: > Otherwise tho' being able to make statements about a graph is a major > use-case atm for me. But there doesn't seem to be any legal while > sane way to do this - reflection/reification is not how I want to go > about it, even if I was sure the semantics would pan out (reification > to identify a graph?). How about treating a graph as a Bag of Statements? Definitely legal, and I don't see how is it insane. I don't understand, why so many RDF users and implementers shy away from reification? -- Dmitry Borodaenko
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 14:42:50 UTC