W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2003

Re: making statements about a graph

From: Dmitry Borodaenko <d.borodaenko@sam-solutions.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 21:43:15 +0200
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Message-ID: <20031105194315.GA8961@sam-solutions.net>

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 06:13:31PM +0000, Bill de h?ra wrote:
> Otherwise tho'  being able to make statements about a graph is a major
> use-case atm for me. But there  doesn't seem to be any legal while
> sane way to do this - reflection/reification is not how I want to go
> about it, even if I was sure the semantics would pan out (reification
> to identify a graph?).

How about treating a graph as a Bag of Statements? Definitely legal, and
I don't see how is it insane. I don't understand, why so many RDF users
and implementers shy away from reification?

Dmitry Borodaenko
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 14:42:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:45 UTC