> 3 - with due respect to the folks involved, I think the current Rules > charter is way too broad, and a WG started in that area would thrash > for a long time. I think we need activity to determine how to limit > such a charter to something doable, or find a more viable "de facto" > standard to build from -- as far as I can see we dn't have a > consensus in that area -- I would hope EU/DARPA/NSF or others might > host a forum in which such a consensus could emerge - I'd like to point out that the negotiations to establish the 4 year EU Network of Excellence REWERSE (= Reasoning on the Web with Rules and Semantics) probably starting in March/April 2004 are at their final stage. It is an essential objective of this network to contribute to W3C's rule standardization efforts. It would be good if similar DARPA/NSF initiatives would be coordinated/synchronized with REWERSE. -Gerd --------------------------------------- Gerd Wagner http://tmitwww.tm.tue.nl/staff/gwagner/ Dep. Information & Technology Eindhoven University of Technology Email: G.Wagner@tm.tue.nl Phone: (+31 40) 247 26 17 Fax: (+31 40) 247 26 12Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2003 12:14:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:45 UTC