RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents

On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 08:40, Danny Ayers wrote:
> > Well, having a deployment platform that is sensitive to efficiency
> > issues (i.e. mobile phones), I'd just as soon not leave such issues
> > for "later work".
> Fair enough, but wouldn't this route lead straight to a binary serialization
> of RDF?
> > Use the existing web architecture, definitely. Trying to extend/bend
> > the semantics of the existing verbs, no.
> >
> > If you're not familiar with URIQA, have a look at
> >
> > to see how I've been approaching this problem.
> If you can GET why is there a need for MGET?


The biggest problem with MGET is:

	What do you do when you want metadata about metadata? 


Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 12:55:44 UTC