W3C home
Mailing lists
Public
public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org from May 2005
by thread
107 messages
:
Starting
Tuesday, 3 May 2005 19:57:18 UTC,
Ending
Tuesday, 31 May 2005 14:01:42 UTC
Sort by
:
thread
author
date
subject
Mail actions
:
mail a new topic
Help
:
how to use the archives
search the archives
real players
Jasmine Fields
(Monday, 30 May)
Re: LC84a: Operation Name Mapping Requirement is ambiguous
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 28 May)
Re: LC84a: Operation Name Mapping Requirement is ambiguous
David Booth
(Tuesday, 31 May)
RE: The description of wsdli:wsdlLocation attribute is limiting (Editorial Item)
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 28 May)
RE: Clarification for wsdl:required attribute needed
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 28 May)
RE: {message label} property of Binding Message Reference Component Should be REQUIRED
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 28 May)
RE: Editorial: Setting Default Values
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 28 May)
RE: wsdl:import semantics is different from xs:import
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 28 May)
RE: Clarification needed: Part 3 sec 2.8.1 and 2.8.2: soap fault codes
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 28 May)
RE: Clarification needed: Part 3 sec 2.8.1 and 2.8.2: soap fault codes
David Booth
(Tuesday, 31 May)
RE: XML Schema comment on WSDL 2.0
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 28 May)
RE: Pluggability of Schema Languages in WSDL
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 28 May)
RE: URI References for Schema Components
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 28 May)
RE: Comments
Jonathan Marsh
(Tuesday, 24 May)
Re: Comments
Rich Salz
(Tuesday, 24 May)
Re: Comments
Rich Salz
(Tuesday, 24 May)
RE: Comments
Jonathan Marsh
(Tuesday, 24 May)
Re: Comments
Rich Salz
(Tuesday, 24 May)
RE: Comments
Jonathan Marsh
(Friday, 27 May)
Re: Comments
Rich Salz
(Friday, 27 May)
Re: Comments
Arthur Ryman
(Friday, 27 May)
Re: Comments
Rich Salz
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: typo
David Booth
(Tuesday, 17 May)
RE: The WSDL 2.0 XSD for Root Element is Too Loose
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Proposed Changes to the Interface Component, Features and Properties
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Action 2004-11-11 check on operation@style (LC61a) (or REOPEN LC21 Resolution B)
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Multiple input and output elements for an operation
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: HTTP Error code for faults (part3, sec 3.7)
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Idle question
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Raising an ugly issue again
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Raising an ugly issue again
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
Re: Raising an ugly issue again
Anne Thomas Manes
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: New LC issue: XML Schema required (appears twice)
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Feature and Property Composition for Binding Operation Omits Interface Operation
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Faults that are not described in WSDL?
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas?
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Part 3, SOAP Binding - Editorial Issues
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Message Reference Component is Underspecified
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Message Reference Component is Underspecified
Jonathan Marsh
(Monday, 23 May)
RE: a WSDL whatsit? (conformance terminology)
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: a WSDL whatsit? (conformance terminology)
David Booth
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: New Issue RPC Style (and proposed fix)
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Misc Part1 editorial issues
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Misc Part1 editorial issues
David Booth
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Consistency of WSDL Component property names
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Editorial: Ambiguous use of the terms "include" and "import"
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Editorial: Ambiguous use of the terms "include" and "import"
David Booth
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: MEP template
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: WSDL 2.0 Part3, Sec. 3.4
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Another part 1 typo
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Another part 1 typo
David Booth
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import
David Booth
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Editorial Comment: wsdl:include
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Editorial: Typos
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Editorial: Typos
David Booth
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: LC107 and Inconsistent Component Names
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Editorial: In section 2.15.3, "and" should be "or"
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Editorial: In section 2.15.3, "and" should be "or"
David Booth
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Component Designators - what's the unique identifier?
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: The Component Model Does Not Enforce Component Nesting
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: The Component Model is Underconstrained wrt the WSDL 2.0 Schema
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Extension Components are not Described
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: Editorial comments on WSDL 2.0 Part 1
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments
Jonathan Marsh
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 28 May)
RE: Mixing Schema Languages
Jonathan Marsh
(Friday, 20 May)
RE: Mixing Schema Languages
Jonathan Marsh
(Saturday, 28 May)
RE: XMLP Review of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 LC WD
michael.mahan@nokia.com
(Friday, 13 May)
RE: wsdl:include semantics is different from xs:include
Jonathan Marsh
(Friday, 13 May)
RE: XML Schema comment "T2" on WSDL 2.0
Jonathan Marsh
(Friday, 13 May)
RE: issues with wsdl:endpoint@address
Jonathan Marsh
(Friday, 13 May)
RE: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts
Jonathan Marsh
(Friday, 13 May)
RE: Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNamespace?
Jonathan Marsh
(Friday, 13 May)
Re: Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNamespace?
Jeehong Min
(Friday, 13 May)
FW: binding/operation/infault|outfault?
Jonathan Marsh
(Thursday, 12 May)
RE: Clarificatioin for binding fault
Jonathan Marsh
(Thursday, 12 May)
RE: WSDL Last Call issue
Jonathan Marsh
(Thursday, 12 May)
RE: Optional predefined features in Part 2
Jonathan Marsh
(Thursday, 12 May)
RE: Message Exchange Patterns -- p2c and/or p2e
Jonathan Marsh
(Thursday, 12 May)
RE: Message Exchange Patterns -- p2c and/or p2e
David Booth
(Saturday, 21 May)
RE: binding/operation/infault|outfault?
Jonathan Marsh
(Thursday, 12 May)
RE: Editorial last call review comments
Jacek Kopecky
(Thursday, 12 May)
RE: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, Editorial comments
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
(Thursday, 12 May)
RE: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings
Jonathan Marsh
(Wednesday, 11 May)
RE: Last call review comments
Jonathan Marsh
(Wednesday, 11 May)
RE: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments
Jonathan Marsh
(Wednesday, 11 May)
RE: re; Editorial: Typo in Section 3.7.3 Part 2 - HTTP Fault
Asir Vedamuthu
(Friday, 6 May)
RE: mustUnderstand" - ??
Jonathan Marsh
(Thursday, 5 May)
RE: mustUnderstand" - ??
Asir Vedamuthu
(Friday, 6 May)
RE: URI Style and SOAP Response Pattern
Jonathan Marsh
(Thursday, 5 May)
RE: URI Style and SOAP Response Pattern
Asir Vedamuthu
(Friday, 6 May)
RE: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues
Jonathan Marsh
(Thursday, 5 May)
RE: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
(Thursday, 12 May)
Resolution of LC89e
Glen Daniels
(Thursday, 5 May)
Re: Resolution of LC89e
Rich Salz
(Thursday, 5 May)
RE: Clarify whether Parts 2 & 3 MUST be supported
Jonathan Marsh
(Tuesday, 3 May)
RE: Clarify whether Parts 2 & 3 MUST be supported
David Booth
(Tuesday, 17 May)
RE: Issue: describing the HTTP error text for faults
Jonathan Marsh
(Tuesday, 3 May)
RE: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0
Jonathan Marsh
(Tuesday, 3 May)
RE: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0
Asir Vedamuthu
(Friday, 6 May)
RE: Property Composition Edge Cases
Jonathan Marsh
(Tuesday, 3 May)
RE: Property Composition Edge Cases
Asir Vedamuthu
(Friday, 6 May)
RE: Feature Composition Edge Cases
Jonathan Marsh
(Tuesday, 3 May)
RE: Feature Composition Edge Cases
Asir Vedamuthu
(Friday, 6 May)
Last message date
: Tuesday, 31 May 2005 14:01:42 UTC