RE: Clarification needed: Part 3 sec 2.8.1 and 2.8.2: soap fault codes

I am satisfied with this resolution.


On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 15:19 -0700, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment LC94
> [1].  The Working Group closed this issue without action, after the
> conversation at [2] (which you participated in).
> 
> If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
> satisfies your concern.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC94
> [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Feb/att-0013/2005020
> 3-ws-desc-minutes.html#item12 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Booth
> > Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 1:00 PM
> > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: Clarification needed: Part 3 sec 2.8.1 and 2.8.2: soap fault
> > codes
> > 
> > 
> > Regarding part 3 sec 2.8.1 and 2.8.2: soap fault codes, the meaning of
> > the {soap fault code} seems unclear.
> > 
> > Does the fault message type determine the soap fault code, or vice
> > versa?  For example, given the following:
> > 
> > <binding . . . >
> >   <fault ref="tns:myFaultMessage"
> > 	wsoap:code="foo" />
> > </binding
> > 
> > which of the following interpretations applies?
> > 
> > a. If the actual error condition causing the fault corresponds to SOAP
> > code foo, then transmit a fault of type tns:myFaultMessage.
> > 
> > b. If the actual error condition causing the fault corresponds to
> > tns:myFaultMessage, then transmit SOAP code foo.
> > 
> > If (a) is the correct interpretation, then what happens if an error
> > corresponding to a different SOAP code occurs?  Does this imply that a
> > tns:myFaultMessage will NOT be sent if the SOAP code is NOT foo?
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > David Booth
> > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> > 
> 
-- 
David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>

Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2005 14:01:42 UTC