- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 15:39:48 -0700
- To: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment
LC103 [1]. The Working Group agreed to make the message label property
of the binding message reference component required, and substitute an
error for empty in the text in the message label mapping in table 2-13.
If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
satisfies your concern.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC103
> The {message label} property of the Binding Message Reference
> component [1] should be REQUIRED. This property always exists,
> however, it is allowed to be OPTIONAL in the XML infoset because it
> can be inferred in the case that there is exactly one message with the
> specified {direction} property in the MEP. It is OK to have it
> OPTIONAL in the XML infoset as an authoring convenience. But this
> property always has a definite value so it should be REQUIRED in the
> Component Model.
>
> [1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#Binding_Message_Reference
Received on Saturday, 28 May 2005 22:40:02 UTC