W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > May 2005

RE: Component Designators - what's the unique identifier?

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 20:43:13 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A5079E99B6@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>

Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment LC87
[1].  The Working Group referred it to the editors for incorporation.
If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
satisfies your concern.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC87

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 2:45 PM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Component Designators - what's the unique identifier?
> Section C.2 of the latest editors draft says:
> "Columns two through five specify the identifiers that uniquely
> identify
> the component. Identifiers are typically formed from the {name}
> property, although in several cases references to other components are
> used."
> It is not immediately clear which property uniquely identifies the
> component, namely, is the {message label} a unique identifier for a
> message reference component?  It's not called out as such in the
> description of that property, so it would be much clearer if we just
> said "it's the {name} property of component v,w,x, the {message label}
> property of component y, and the {blah} property of component z."
> Also
> might be best to say "uniquely identify the component within it's
> context."
Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 03:43:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:31:01 UTC