- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 20:44:01 -0700
- To: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A5079E99C3@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment LC113 [1]. The Working Group agreed to incorporate this proposal into the spec (along with the amendment at [2]). If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC113 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0029.html ________________________________ From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 5:48 AM To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org Subject: Feature and Property Composition for Binding Operation Omits Interface Operation I think there is an ommission. In the Feature [1] and Property [2] Composition sections, the in-scope components for Binding Operation should include those of the corresponding Interface Operation. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#Feature_composition_model [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#Property_composition_model Arthur Ryman, Rational Desktop Tools Development phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/
Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 03:44:32 UTC