RE: Extension Components are not Described

Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment LC80
[1].  The Working Group declined to make any changes to the spec as a
result, not seeing compelling value in an architected solution for
component extensions.  If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we
will assume this satisfies your concern.





[] On Behalf Of Arthur
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 2:44 PM
Subject: Extension Components are not Described


Part 1 mentions Extension components, but does not descibe them in any
detail. For example, they are mentioned in the Operation Name Mapping
Requirement [1] and in the Component URI References [2]. If Extension
components are important, they should be defined. For example, I'd
expect that they at least have a QName. 


Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text:

Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 03:43:14 UTC