- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 20:43:53 -0700
- To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>, "Edward Peters" <EPeters@webMethods.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment LC127 [1]. The Working Group referred this to the editors for incorporation. If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC127 > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 3:05 PM > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: Editorial Comment: wsdl:include > > > Section 4.1 [1] > > "The WSDL 2.0 include element information item allows for the > separation of > different components of a service definition, belonging to the same > target > namespace, into independent WSDL 2.0 documents which can be merged as > needed." > > As you know, include mechanism is not about merging documents. > Suggestion: > delete "which can be merged as needed". > > [1] > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?co > ntent- > type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#includes > > PS: I believe that Roberto raised the same editorial issue in mid > April. > Couldn't find the mail URI tho. > > Regards, > Asir S Vedamuthu > asirv at webmethods dot com > http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 03:44:01 UTC