RE: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0

Thank you for considering my comment.


-----Original Message-----
[] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:14 PM
To: Asir Vedamuthu
Subject: RE: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0

Thank you for the comment below, and for your patience with us in
resolving it.  We tracked the comment below as Issue LC28 [1].  The WG
adopted the proposal at [2] to fix the issue.  The editors have
incorporated the fix into their latest drafts [2].

If you agree with our disposition of your comment, we'd like you to
acknowledge it within two weeks; otherwise we will assume you are
satisfied.  The WG plans to enter a second (short) Last Call period in
the near future, and we invite you to review that publication as well.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:public-ws-desc-
>] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 4:32 AM
> To: ''
> Subject: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0
> ref:
> coding-
> decl
> "3.10.1 Description
> Every Binding Message Reference component MAY indicate which transfer
> codings, as defined in section 3.6 of [IETF RFC 2616], are available
> for
> this particular message."
> This feature does not apply to HTTP 1.0 And, when {http version}="1.0"
> and
> {http transfer coding} claim is made, is that an error or should the
> processors safely ignore it? I prefer the latter. Please clarify.
> Regards,
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> asirv at webmethods dot com

Received on Friday, 6 May 2005 18:23:13 UTC