W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Comments

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 15:12:12 -0400
Message-ID: <4297710C.4090004@datapower.com>
To: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
CC: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org, public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org

> The answer is "no", we mean more. The problem is that we are assigning 
> QNames to "nested" components. In the case you cite, the Interface Fault 
> component is nested in an Interface component. While the QName of the 
> Interface component is enough to uniquely identlfy it, the Interface 
> Fault QName is "local" to the parent Interface.
> Put another way, each Interface component defines a new symbol space for 
> Interface Fault component names.

Okay, thanks.

I understand what you're doing, and I think I understand why.

It doesn't seem very xml-like.


Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
Received on Friday, 27 May 2005 19:08:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:31:01 UTC