a WSDL whatsit? (conformance terminology)
Action 2004-11-11 check on operation@style (LC61a) (or REOPEN LC21 Resolution B)
Another part 1 typo
binding/operation/infault|outfault?
Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNamespace?
Clarificatioin for binding fault
Clarification for wsdl:required attribute needed
Clarification needed: Part 3 sec 2.8.1 and 2.8.2: soap fault codes
Clarify whether Parts 2 & 3 MUST be supported
Comments
comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts
Component Designators - what's the unique identifier?
Consistency of WSDL Component property names
Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import
Editorial Comment: wsdl:include
Editorial comments on WSDL 2.0 Part 1
Editorial last call review comments
Editorial: Ambiguous use of the terms "include" and "import"
Editorial: In section 2.15.3, "and" should be "or"
Editorial: Setting Default Values
Editorial: Typos
Extension Components are not Described
Faults that are not described in WSDL?
Feature and Property Composition for Binding Operation Omits Interface Operation
Feature Composition Edge Cases
HTTP Error code for faults (part3, sec 3.7)
HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0
Idle question
Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas?
Issue: describing the HTTP error text for faults
issues with wsdl:endpoint@address
Last call review comments
LC107 and Inconsistent Component Names
LC84a: Operation Name Mapping Requirement is ambiguous
MEP template
Message Exchange Patterns -- p2c and/or p2e
Message Reference Component is Underspecified
Misc Part1 editorial issues
Mixing Schema Languages
Multiple input and output elements for an operation
mustUnderstand" - ??
New Issue RPC Style (and proposed fix)
New LC issue: XML Schema required (appears twice)
Optional predefined features in Part 2
Part 3, SOAP Binding - Editorial Issues
Pluggability of Schema Languages in WSDL
Property Composition Edge Cases
Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model
Proposed Changes to the Interface Component, Features and Properties
QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, Editorial comments
QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues
Raising an ugly issue again
re; Editorial: Typo in Section 3.7.3 Part 2 - HTTP Fault
real players
Resolution of LC89e
The Component Model Does Not Enforce Component Nesting
The Component Model is Underconstrained wrt the WSDL 2.0 Schema
The description of wsdli:wsdlLocation attribute is limiting (Editorial Item)
The WSDL 2.0 XSD for Root Element is Too Loose
typo
URI References for Schema Components
URI Style and SOAP Response Pattern
WSDL 2.0 LC Comments
WSDL 2.0 Part3, Sec. 3.4
WSDL Last Call issue
WSDL2.0 Last Call comments
wsdl:import semantics is different from xs:import
wsdl:include semantics is different from xs:include
XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings
XML Schema comment "T2" on WSDL 2.0
XML Schema comment on WSDL 2.0
XMLP Review of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 LC WD
{message label} property of Binding Message Reference Component Should be REQUIRED
Last message date: Tuesday, 31 May 2005 14:01:42 UTC