Anne Thomas Manes
Arthur Ryman
Asir Vedamuthu
David Booth
- RE: Clarification needed: Part 3 sec 2.8.1 and 2.8.2: soap fault codes (Tuesday, 31 May)
- Re: LC84a: Operation Name Mapping Requirement is ambiguous (Tuesday, 31 May)
- RE: Clarify whether Parts 2 & 3 MUST be supported (Tuesday, 17 May)
- RE: typo (Tuesday, 17 May)
- RE: Editorial: In section 2.15.3, "and" should be "or" (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Editorial: Typos (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Another part 1 typo (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Editorial: Ambiguous use of the terms "include" and "import" (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Misc Part1 editorial issues (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: a WSDL whatsit? (conformance terminology) (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Message Exchange Patterns -- p2c and/or p2e (Saturday, 21 May)
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
Glen Daniels
Jacek Kopecky
Jasmine Fields
Jeehong Min
Jonathan Marsh
- Re: LC84a: Operation Name Mapping Requirement is ambiguous (Saturday, 28 May)
- RE: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (Saturday, 28 May)
- RE: The description of wsdli:wsdlLocation attribute is limiting (Editorial Item) (Saturday, 28 May)
- RE: Clarification for wsdl:required attribute needed (Saturday, 28 May)
- RE: {message label} property of Binding Message Reference Component Should be REQUIRED (Saturday, 28 May)
- RE: Editorial: Setting Default Values (Saturday, 28 May)
- RE: wsdl:import semantics is different from xs:import (Saturday, 28 May)
- RE: Clarification needed: Part 3 sec 2.8.1 and 2.8.2: soap fault codes (Saturday, 28 May)
- RE: XML Schema comment on WSDL 2.0 (Saturday, 28 May)
- RE: Pluggability of Schema Languages in WSDL (Saturday, 28 May)
- RE: URI References for Schema Components (Saturday, 28 May)
- RE: Mixing Schema Languages (Saturday, 28 May)
- RE: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (Friday, 27 May)
- RE: Comments (Friday, 27 May)
- RE: Comments (Tuesday, 24 May)
- RE: Comments (Tuesday, 24 May)
- RE: Message Reference Component is Underspecified (Monday, 23 May)
- RE: Raising an ugly issue again (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: The WSDL 2.0 XSD for Root Element is Too Loose (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Proposed Changes to the Interface Component, Features and Properties (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Action 2004-11-11 check on operation@style (LC61a) (or REOPEN LC21 Resolution B) (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Multiple input and output elements for an operation (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Raising an ugly issue again (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: New Issue RPC Style (and proposed fix) (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: WSDL 2.0 Part3, Sec. 3.4 (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: HTTP Error code for faults (part3, sec 3.7) (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Feature and Property Composition for Binding Operation Omits Interface Operation (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: New LC issue: XML Schema required (appears twice) (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Idle question (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Another part 1 typo (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Part 3, SOAP Binding - Editorial Issues (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Faults that are not described in WSDL? (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Message Reference Component is Underspecified (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Misc Part1 editorial issues (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: a WSDL whatsit? (conformance terminology) (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Editorial Comment: wsdl:include (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Consistency of WSDL Component property names (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Editorial: Ambiguous use of the terms "include" and "import" (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: MEP template (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Editorial: Typos (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: LC107 and Inconsistent Component Names (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Editorial: In section 2.15.3, "and" should be "or" (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Component Designators - what's the unique identifier? (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Extension Components are not Described (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: The Component Model Does Not Enforce Component Nesting (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: The Component Model is Underconstrained wrt the WSDL 2.0 Schema (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Editorial comments on WSDL 2.0 Part 1 (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (Saturday, 21 May)
- RE: Mixing Schema Languages (Friday, 20 May)
- RE: wsdl:include semantics is different from xs:include (Friday, 13 May)
- RE: XML Schema comment "T2" on WSDL 2.0 (Friday, 13 May)
- RE: issues with wsdl:endpoint@address (Friday, 13 May)
- RE: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (Friday, 13 May)
- RE: Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNamespace? (Friday, 13 May)
- FW: binding/operation/infault|outfault? (Thursday, 12 May)
- RE: Clarificatioin for binding fault (Thursday, 12 May)
- RE: WSDL Last Call issue (Thursday, 12 May)
- RE: Optional predefined features in Part 2 (Thursday, 12 May)
- RE: Message Exchange Patterns -- p2c and/or p2e (Thursday, 12 May)
- RE: binding/operation/infault|outfault? (Thursday, 12 May)
- RE: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (Wednesday, 11 May)
- RE: Last call review comments (Wednesday, 11 May)
- RE: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments (Wednesday, 11 May)
- RE: mustUnderstand" - ?? (Thursday, 5 May)
- RE: URI Style and SOAP Response Pattern (Thursday, 5 May)
- RE: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, intro and conformance issues (Thursday, 5 May)
- RE: Clarify whether Parts 2 & 3 MUST be supported (Tuesday, 3 May)
- RE: Issue: describing the HTTP error text for faults (Tuesday, 3 May)
- RE: HTTP Transfer Coding and 1.0 (Tuesday, 3 May)
- RE: Property Composition Edge Cases (Tuesday, 3 May)
- RE: Feature Composition Edge Cases (Tuesday, 3 May)
michael.mahan@nokia.com
Rich Salz
Last message date: Tuesday, 31 May 2005 14:01:42 UTC