RE: Editorial: Typos

This satisfies my concern.


On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 20:43 -0700, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment LC95
> [1].  The Working Group referred this to the editors for incorporation.
> 
> You can view the resolution in context at [2].  If we don't hear
> otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC95
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Booth
> > Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 7:13 PM
> > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: Editorial: Typos
> > 
> > 
> > Typos:
> > 
> > Part 3 sec 2.10.3 Default Binding Rules:
> > s/Inteface Operation/Interface Operation/
> > 
> > Part 3 sec 2.9.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model:
> > s/as defined by for this specific operation/as defined for this
> > specific
> > operation/
> > 
> > Part 1 sec 2.9.1:
> > s/to accessing the service/to access the service/
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > David Booth
> > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> > 
> 
-- 
David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>

Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 18:49:02 UTC