RE: Misc Part1 editorial issues

This resolution satisfies my concern.


On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 20:43 -0700, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment
> LC119 [1].  The Working Group referred this to the editors for
> incorporation.
> 
> If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
> satisfies your concern.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC119
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Booth
> > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 10:52 AM
> > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: Misc Part1 editorial issues
> > 
> > 
> > Misc Part1 editorial issues:
> > 
> > 1. Typos:
> > s/modularize a a given component/modularize a given component/
> > s/unless the are imported/unless they are imported/
> > 
> > 2. The mappings from the XML Infoset-->Component Properties are
> > unidirectional in WSDL 2.0 -- not bidirectional.  (We do not define a
> > mapping back from Component Properties-->XML Infoset.)  This should be
> > clearer whenever these mappings are mentioned.  Therefore, phrases
> > like
> > (in sec 2.1.3):
> > [[
> > The mapping between the properties of the Description component (see
> > 2.1.1 The Description Component) and the XML Representation of the
> > description element information item . . . .
> > ]]
> > should be reworded to something like:
> > [[
> > The mapping from the XML Representation of the description element
> > information item to the properties of the Description component (see
> > 2.1.1 The Description Component) . . . .
> > ]]
> > 
> > This occurs in a quite a number of places, and should be corrected
> > throughout.  Here is another example:
> > [[
> > Table 2-1. Mapping between Description Component Properties and XML
> > Representation
> > ]]
> > should be something like:
> > [[
> > Table 2-1. Mapping from XML Representation to Description Component
> > Properties
> > ]]
> > 
> > 3. In all of the Infoset-->Component Property mapping tables (such as
> > Table 2-1), I suggest changing the column headings from "Property" and
> > "Mapping" to something like "Property Name" and "Property Value
> > (Mapping
> > from Infoset)", in order to be more clearly descriptive.
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > David Booth
> > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> > 
> 
-- 
David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>

Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 18:46:16 UTC