RE: binding/operation/infault|outfault?

Thank you for your comment, tracked as LC55 [1].  The WG agreed to
reintroduce these elements, accepting (along with a few further
clarifications) the proposal at [2].  You can see the resolution in the
latest Working Draft [3].

If we don't hear from you within two weeks, we'll assume this resolution
is satisfactory.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC55
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Nov/0042.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-20050510

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bob Cunnings
> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 8:21 AM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: binding/operation/infault|outfault?
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> In the LC version of Part 1 [1], <infault> and <outfault> element
> information items are no longer listed among the children of the XML
> representation of the Binding Operation component.
> 
> Is there a reason why they fell out? I can't find any reference to
> changes to that area since the removal of
> binding/operation/infault|outfault@messageReference in the 2004/12/04
> teleconference minutes. [2]
> 
> What I would like to be able to do is specify a soap:module [3] in a
> binding for an output fault message for specific operations.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> RC
> 
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#Binding_Operation_XMLRep
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Dec/0017.html
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-bindings-20040803/