- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 15:44:17 -0700
- To: "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A507B4A302@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment LC129 [1]. The Working Group accepted the editor's resolution of this issue. If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC129 ________________________________ From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yalcinalp, Umit Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 12:38 PM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: The description of wsdli:wsdlLocation attribute is limiting (Editorial Item) Dear All, I was reading the current draft of the WSDL 2.0 core spec. There seems to be some disconnect in the current drafts. Check out what the wsdli:wsdlLocation element definition says: The type of the wsdlLocation attribute information item is a list xs:anyURI. Its actual value MUST be a list of pairs of URIs; where the first URI of a pair, which MUST be an absolute URI as defined in [IETF RFC 3986 <file:///\\l%20> ], indicates a WSDL 2.0 namespace name, and, the second a hint as to the location of a WSDL 2.0 document defining WSDL 2.0 components for that namespace name. The second URI of a pair MAY be absolute or relative. I am under the impression that we were NOT going to limit the use of this to WSDL 2.0 documents, and WSDL 2.0 components so that it can be used for WSDL1.1 documents, in particular by WS-Addressing. It seems like an editorial item that did not get incorporated into the spec which should be fixed. Thanks. --umit [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?cont ent-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#wsdlLocation-aii <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?con tent-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#wsdlLocation-aii>
Received on Saturday, 28 May 2005 22:44:28 UTC