- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 20:43:58 -0700
- To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment LC119 [1]. The Working Group referred this to the editors for incorporation. If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC119 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Booth > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 10:52 AM > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > Subject: Misc Part1 editorial issues > > > Misc Part1 editorial issues: > > 1. Typos: > s/modularize a a given component/modularize a given component/ > s/unless the are imported/unless they are imported/ > > 2. The mappings from the XML Infoset-->Component Properties are > unidirectional in WSDL 2.0 -- not bidirectional. (We do not define a > mapping back from Component Properties-->XML Infoset.) This should be > clearer whenever these mappings are mentioned. Therefore, phrases > like > (in sec 2.1.3): > [[ > The mapping between the properties of the Description component (see > 2.1.1 The Description Component) and the XML Representation of the > description element information item . . . . > ]] > should be reworded to something like: > [[ > The mapping from the XML Representation of the description element > information item to the properties of the Description component (see > 2.1.1 The Description Component) . . . . > ]] > > This occurs in a quite a number of places, and should be corrected > throughout. Here is another example: > [[ > Table 2-1. Mapping between Description Component Properties and XML > Representation > ]] > should be something like: > [[ > Table 2-1. Mapping from XML Representation to Description Component > Properties > ]] > > 3. In all of the Infoset-->Component Property mapping tables (such as > Table 2-1), I suggest changing the column headings from "Property" and > "Mapping" to something like "Property Name" and "Property Value > (Mapping > from Infoset)", in order to be more clearly descriptive. > > > -- > > David Booth > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard >
Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 03:44:13 UTC