RE: XML Schema comment "T2" on WSDL 2.0

Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment LC91 [1].  The Working Group agreed to incorporate the wording you suggest.  You can view the resolution in context at [2] and [3].  If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:public-ws-desc-
>] On Behalf Of Xan Gregg
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 5:16 PM
> To:
> Cc:
> Subject: XML Schema comment "T2" on WSDL 2.0
> The following is a comment on the WSDL 2.0 last call [1] from the XML
> Schema WG.  We very much appologize about the lateness of this
> comment.
> Xan Gregg, for the XML Schema WG
> [1]
> This is an editorial comment on the impact of xs:import in 3.1.1 and
> 3.1.2.
> 3.1.1 contains:
>      Note that only components defined in the schema itself
>      and components included by it via xs:include are available
>      to WSDL. Specifically, components that the schema imports
>      via xs:import are NOT available to WSDL.
> We think this is correct, but not all of us were sure of the intent at
> first reading, so we suggest wording along the following lines, which
> reinforces the idea that it is a namespace that is imported, not a
> schema.
> For 3.1.1 instead of the above two sentences:
>     Note that only components in the imported namespace are
>     available for reference in the WSDL document.
> For 3.1.2 instead of the similar two sentences, we suggest:
>      Note that only components in the namespace corresponding
>      to the targetNamespace attribute of the embedded schema
>      element are available for reference in the WSDL document.
> (The latter also emphasizes that the targetNamespace is a property of
> the schema element and not of the schema itself.)

Received on Friday, 13 May 2005 19:34:09 UTC