RE: Multiple input and output elements for an operation

Thank you for your comment - we tracked this as a Last Call comment
LC109 [1].  As I said below, multiple inputs and outputs are allowed for
extensibility purposes.  The Working Group referred this matter to the
editors for clarification.

 

If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
satisfies your concern.

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC109

 

 

________________________________

From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Marsh
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 11:36 AM
To: Zvi Bruckner; public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Subject: RE: Multiple input and output elements for an operation

 

The meaning of multiple inputs or outputs is defined by the Message
Exchange Pattern in use.  None of the MEPs in the Part 2 make use of
multiple inputs or outputs.  In effect, the schema allows them as an
extensibility point.

 

However, it might be a problem that only the primer says infault and
outfault define alternative fault messages.  That should probably be
fixed (or clarified if I just missed it) in Part 1 or Part 2.

 

________________________________

From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Zvi
Bruckner
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:39 AM
To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Subject: Multiple input and output elements for an operation

 

The WSDL schema allowa multiple input, output, infault and outfault
within an operation.

The primer says that multiple infault and outfault define alternative
fault message.

It does not define the role of of multiple input/output. Are they also
regraded as alternative?

 

Regards,

Zvi Bruckner.