public-w3process@w3.org from March 2012 by subject

an alternative to the current REC process

AW: Features vs specs

AW: Patent Policy issues...

AW: Survey: topics for W3C members to consider

AW: What are the PD/PP constraints? [Was: Re: Request by AB]

Bottlenecks in the Rec track

corrected: an alternative to the current REC process

Current discussion - needed organization

Evaluating policies; pubrules

Features vs specs

formatting fixed: an alternative to the current REC process

How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications

html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC

marking obsolete TRs - ISSUE-2

marking old TRs as obsolete - RE: "Living Standards"

Patent Policy issues...

Proposal: Approval on a section by section basis of a draft

Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules

Questionnaire: List of Concerns about Standards Development in W3C [Was: Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications]

snapshots vs living standards

snapshots vs. living standards

Spec organizations and prioritization

Survey: topics for W3C members to consider

W3C Spec Tester/Editor's Fund Re: Spec organizations and prioritization

What are the PD/PP constraints? [Was: Re: Request by AB]

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 March 2012 01:45:55 UTC