- From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:47:44 +0100
- To: "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>, "Steve Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Carr, Wayne" <wayne.carr@intel.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:38:00 +0100, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi marco, >> What about having a disclaimer in the SoTD that states "Caution, this is > an Editor's draft and hence may contain changes not yet agreed to by the > WG"... or some such. > > I don't think thats enough, what the HTML5 spec had before last call was > markers on any parts of the spec that had an issue raised against it > with a > link to the issue. this was achieved using a script. > > I think that having an indicator for any non editorial change that has > not > been agreed by a working group would be useful. > while that would be nice to have, I doubt is feasible, but I don't have editing experience to be sure about this ;) /g > regards > steve > > > On 22 March 2012 15:31, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, 22 March 2012 at 15:28, Carr, Wayne wrote: >> >> > That particular proposal wasn't changing anything about the formal >> stages in TR. It was only to use the Editor's draft on the TR page >> instead >> of periodically publishing a WG Draft. (this was a proposal just about >> that >> - there was a different larger proposal). >> > >> > As an example, the html5 draft on the html TR page [1] at this moment >> is >> dated 2011-05-25. It will be updated soon, but the point is that now WG >> drafts on TR pages can be so old they're pointless to look at. If they >> can't be updated say within 6 weeks, it would be better to publish the >> Editor's draft on that page (with any content not agreed to, including >> content that is significantly altered, as "recent change, to be >> reviewed by >> WG" or something like that (to avoid concerns over Editor changes not >> yet >> agreed to by the WG). >> > >> >> >> What about having a disclaimer in the SoTD that states "Caution, this is >> an Editor's draft and hence may contain changes not yet agreed to by the >> WG"... or some such. >> >> -- >> Marcos Caceres >> http://datadriven.com.au >> >> >> >> >> > > -- Giuseppe Pascale TV & Connected Devices Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:48:24 UTC