- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:24:17 +0000
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: "Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich" <k.scheppe@telekom.de>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+VkLufh0GZkSYgMksUJo4nLrL4-wTZfQ=sMDvfaJH8R-Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Marcos, "I'll note that the WHATWG HTML spec has had per feature stability labels for a couple of years. Not sure how they determine feature stability, however (i think it's based on implementation reports and on the bug-count in their bug tracker for a given feature)." looking at the data available it appears unreliable at best. Also does not take into account accessibility implementation support. regards Stevef On 20 March 2012 11:18, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, 20 March 2012 at 08:15, Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich wrote: > > > Hi Dom, > > > > I am glad to chimed in, because you do have a very good grasp of the > process. > > > > And I really like your points. > > > > My proposal for experimental specs at the last AC meeting, which I guess > in the end led to the establishment of this group, pretty much rests on > what you explain to be a feature based focus. > > > > That is exactly what I meant, but you said it better. > > There are always portions of a spec that are stable enough. > > > > I had suggested perhaps simply labeling these "features" as stable such > that implementers can move on with a higher degree of certainty that that > portion will not change anymore. > > Will there be 100% security of stability? > > Of course not, but that would be unreasonable. > > You expanded that into the review and testing portion, which is > absolutely correct. > > > > In that sense, getting to your question to what a feature is, I propose > applying that label to any given section of a spec that the WG views as a > feature and may declare stable out of their own volition. They would know > best and could decide best. > > > > I'll note that the WHATWG HTML spec has had per feature stability labels > for a couple of years. Not sure how they determine feature stability, > however (i think it's based on implementation reports and on the bug-count > in their bug tracker for a given feature). > > > > -- > Marcos Caceres > http://datadriven.com.au > > > > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 11:25:11 UTC