- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:19:02 +0100
- To: "Karl Dubost" <karld@opera.com>
- Cc: public-w3process@w3.org, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:13:20 +0100, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote:
An elegant statement of one of my central points (and with much classier
metaphors than I would use).
> Le 5 mars 2012 à 05:49, Charles McCathieNevile a écrit :
>> I think a more sensible charaterisation is between a stabilising
>> publication process (I'll continue to call this the 'snapshot model'
>> here
>> because I doubt that trying to change terms is useful), and one where
>> changes can just be thrown in at any time.
>
> May I note that there are both snapshot models with different release
> paces.
Yes. That is where I started... and you're right that it is on its own an
important point.
cheers
> We are building a wall where they should not be, because each community
> sees the time which matter to them. To build a cathedral, you need(ed)
> centuries, to build a house a few weeks. I would call it "time for
> completing actions".
>
> We have different social constraints for our specifications. The time
> range in between two changes which matter for a community depends on its
> community.
>
> * Software Engineers
> * IT Lawyers
> * QA people
> * Web developers
> * Web marketers
> * Physical devices builders
>
> Requirement 3: Identify who and/or what will implement the
> specification.
> — http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#implement-principle
>
> It might be that the different type of crowds will not have to use the
> specification terms in the same way. W3C specifications have evolved
>
> from a generic description of the technology and a "free to
> implementation" on the algorithmic part
>
> to a very precise description almost a "textual reference
> implementation"
>
> So each time we talk about the way to publish, maybe we should be
> talking about time it takes to achieve things for each relevant crowd
> and how we articulate the flow of information around this more than
> document themselves which are just representations of an idea.
>
>
--
Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 15:19:36 UTC