- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:19:02 +0100
- To: "Karl Dubost" <karld@opera.com>
- Cc: public-w3process@w3.org, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:13:20 +0100, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote: An elegant statement of one of my central points (and with much classier metaphors than I would use). > Le 5 mars 2012 à 05:49, Charles McCathieNevile a écrit : >> I think a more sensible charaterisation is between a stabilising >> publication process (I'll continue to call this the 'snapshot model' >> here >> because I doubt that trying to change terms is useful), and one where >> changes can just be thrown in at any time. > > May I note that there are both snapshot models with different release > paces. Yes. That is where I started... and you're right that it is on its own an important point. cheers > We are building a wall where they should not be, because each community > sees the time which matter to them. To build a cathedral, you need(ed) > centuries, to build a house a few weeks. I would call it "time for > completing actions". > > We have different social constraints for our specifications. The time > range in between two changes which matter for a community depends on its > community. > > * Software Engineers > * IT Lawyers > * QA people > * Web developers > * Web marketers > * Physical devices builders > > Requirement 3: Identify who and/or what will implement the > specification. > — http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#implement-principle > > It might be that the different type of crowds will not have to use the > specification terms in the same way. W3C specifications have evolved > > from a generic description of the technology and a "free to > implementation" on the algorithmic part > > to a very precise description almost a "textual reference > implementation" > > So each time we talk about the way to publish, maybe we should be > talking about time it takes to achieve things for each relevant crowd > and how we articulate the flow of information around this more than > document themselves which are just representations of an idea. > > -- Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 15:19:36 UTC