- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:53:14 +0100
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
Le mardi 20 mars 2012 à 11:41 -0400, Jeff Jaffe a écrit : > As a strawman, I would propose that to achieve your goal we need zero > changes to the W3C process. Rather we need changes to a practices and > culture, through a single characteristic - modularization. > > I may be misinformed, but my impression is that what you are requesting > is precisely what we are trying to achieve with CSS 3. It is close, but not precisely; CSS3 is better in that it defines smaller modules, but we still struggle with slow standardization (e.g. the prefix war). The reason is that these modules aren't built around implementations schedule (or intents to implement), but about what the WG think makes a logical consistent set. I believe a number of CSS3 modules could go to CR today if they were trimmed of features nobody has started to implement. (also, I'm not talking about modularization because it's a loaded word for some people) Dom
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 15:53:41 UTC