- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:10:27 -0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
On 3/22/2012 10:06 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:48:49 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux > <dom@w3.org> wrote: >> Actually, I think any cost estimate we would get would be entirely >> dwarfed by the estimates we would get by asking microsoft, google, and >> apple about the cost they would associate with getting sued over a >> feature they're deploying in their browsers today. And I don't need to >> mention all the services and content providers that rely on these >> features to get their business done today. So I don't really think we >> need that particular data to determine that this would be a very good >> ROI. > > Yes you do. Have companies operating in the same WG sued each other > yet over technology being defined in that WG? What is the price of > having competent people do make work instead of actual work? (Consider > also that time not invested in actually improving the platform helps > competing platforms.) > > Companies in the same WG can't sue each other about RF work in that WG. They do sue each other all the time for non-RF protected work.
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 14:10:42 UTC