- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:59:43 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
Le mardi 20 mars 2012 à 08:38 -0700, Anne van Kesteren a écrit : > On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:33:17 -0700, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> > wrote: > Yes I do assume that. As I said at TPAC the problem we have is getting RF > commitments. Everything else we are doing with editor's drafts and > addressing feedback continuously is working quite great and requires no > process whatsoever. Snapshotting editor's drafts for RF commitments seems > totally achievable. That works only if that new process is compatible with the Patent Policy. Could you clarify how would the exclusion/disclosure process work with your snapshotting approach? Dom
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 16:00:07 UTC