- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:31:12 +0100
- To: "Steve Zilles" <steve@zilles.org>, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org>
- Cc: public-w3process@w3.org, "'Giuseppe Pascale'" <giuseppep@opera.com>, ab@w3.org, "Stephen Zilles" <szilles@adobe.com>
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:18:24 +0100, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote:
> On 3/20/2012 12:05 AM, Steve Zilles wrote:
>> All,
>> There are already 3 items on the List of Concerns [1], all under
>> Contextual/Social Framework, that, separately, cover various aspects
>> of this request. These are:
>> * What are the various audiences for documents?
>> * Desire for stable reference.
>> * Official drafts are disconnected from some audience needs.
>> It does not seem necessary to add anything to the list, but the request
>> should be considered with these items.
>
> I agree that the three bullets referenced could (in principle) include
> the issue of how organizations that we liaison with normatively
> reference our standards. But I don't see verbiage in the detailed
> description that would make me confident that the Open IPTV forum
> concern got addressed. Would anyone object to making the detailed
> verbiage more specific to this requirement?
I think that would be great and look forward to your wording ;)
cheers
--
Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 16:31:52 UTC