Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules

I am strongly in favour of Wayne's proposal.

regards
Stevef

On 21 March 2012 11:38, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 20 March 2012 at 20:48, Carr, Wayne wrote:
>
> > Proposal: For WGs that have public editor's drafts, put the disclosure
> notice in the Editor's draft and put the Editor's draft on the TR page.
> Don't publish regular formal heartbeat drafts. Just publish formal
> versioned drafts for the required stages (First Draft, LC, CR, PR, REC).
> Also, provide access to the editor's drafts under source control so people
> can look at it at a particular date if they need to.
>
> I would be strongly in favour of this :)
>
> --
> Marcos Caceres
> http://datadriven.com.au
>
>
>
>
>