- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 07:51:38 -0400
- To: "ext Carr, Wayne" <wayne.carr@intel.com>
- CC: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 3/20/12 4:48 PM, ext Carr, Wayne wrote: > Proposal: For WGs that have public editor's drafts, put the disclosure notice in the Editor's draft and put the Editor's draft on the TR page. Don't publish regular formal heartbeat drafts. Just publish formal versioned drafts for the required stages (First Draft, LC, CR, PR, REC). Also, provide access to the editor's drafts under source control so people can look at it at a particular date if they need to. Isn't this already the case for WGs that include a link to the Editor's Draft in the spec header and don't enforce heartbeat pubs just for the sake of it? If a WG does want to publish intermediate WDs (i.e. WDs between FPWD and LCWD) on /TR/, I don't think the process should prohibit it. -Thanks, ArtB
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2012 11:52:01 UTC