public-w3process@w3.org from March 2012 by date

Wednesday, 28 March 2012

• Re: Current discussion - needed organization therandshow@gmail.com

Tuesday, 27 March 2012

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Karl Dubost

Monday, 26 March 2012

• RE: Spec organizations and prioritization Carr, Wayne
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Spec organizations and prioritization Carr, Wayne
• Current discussion - needed organization Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization fantasai
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Daniel Glazman
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Daniel Glazman

Sunday, 25 March 2012

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization L. David Baron
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Daniel Glazman
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Jeff Jaffe

Saturday, 24 March 2012

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Rand McRanderson
• Proposal: Approval on a section by section basis of a draft Rand McRanderson
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 20 March 2012

• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Eduardo Gutentag
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Eduardo Gutentag
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Eduardo Gutentag

Friday, 23 March 2012

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Steve Faulkner
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• RE: Spec organizations and prioritization Carr, Wayne
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• RE: Spec organizations and prioritization Carr, Wayne
• Re: Survey: topics for W3C members to consider Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Carr, Wayne
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Survey: topics for W3C members to consider Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Survey: topics for W3C members to consider Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Survey: topics for W3C members to consider Marcos Caceres
• AW: Survey: topics for W3C members to consider Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich

Thursday, 22 March 2012

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Daniel Glazman
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules fantasai
• Re: W3C Spec Tester/Editor's Fund Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Jeff Jaffe
• W3C Spec Tester/Editor's Fund Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Daniel Glazman
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Steve Faulkner
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Giuseppe Pascale
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Marcos Caceres
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Steve Faulkner
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Giuseppe Pascale
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Giuseppe Pascale
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Marcos Caceres
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Steve Faulkner
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Giuseppe Pascale
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Marcos Caceres
• RE: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Carr, Wayne
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Giuseppe Pascale
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Giuseppe Pascale
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Julian Reschke
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Jeff Jaffe
• Survey: topics for W3C members to consider Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Julian Reschke
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Julian Reschke
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Julian Reschke
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Julian Reschke
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Giuseppe Pascale
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Marcos Caceres
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Tobie Langel
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC fantasai
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules fantasai

Wednesday, 21 March 2012

• RE: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Carr, Wayne
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Tobie Langel
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules fantasai
• RE: formatting fixed: an alternative to the current REC process Carr, Wayne
• RE: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Carr, Wayne
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: formatting fixed: an alternative to the current REC process Arthur Barstow
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Robert Freund
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Marcos Caceres
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Arthur Barstow
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Steve Faulkner
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Marcos Caceres

Tuesday, 20 March 2012

• formatting fixed: an alternative to the current REC process Carr, Wayne
• corrected: an alternative to the current REC process Carr, Wayne
• an alternative to the current REC process Carr, Wayne
• Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules Carr, Wayne
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Stephen Zilles
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Jeff Jaffe
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Jeff Jaffe
• Evaluating policies; pubrules Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Bottlenecks in the Rec track Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Features vs specs Marcos Caceres
• Re: Features vs specs Steve Faulkner
• Re: Features vs specs Marcos Caceres
• Re: Features vs specs Steve Faulkner
• Re: Features vs specs Marcos Caceres
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization Anne van Kesteren
• Spec organizations and prioritization Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• AW: Features vs specs Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich

Monday, 19 March 2012

• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Karl Dubost
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Carr, Wayne
• Questionnaire: List of Concerns about Standards Development in W3C [Was: Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications] Arthur Barstow
• Features vs specs Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Arthur Barstow
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Giuseppe Pascale
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Tobie Langel
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Jeff Jaffe
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Giuseppe Pascale
• How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications Giuseppe Pascale

Wednesday, 14 March 2012

• Re: Patent Policy issues... Ian Jacobs
• Re: Patent Policy issues... Arthur Barstow

Tuesday, 13 March 2012

• Re: Patent Policy issues... Ian Jacobs
• RE: Patent Policy issues... Carr, Wayne
• Re: Patent Policy issues... Ian Jacobs
• Re: Patent Policy issues... Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Patent Policy issues... Arthur Barstow
• RE: Patent Policy issues... Carr, Wayne
• AW: Patent Policy issues... Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich

Monday, 12 March 2012

• RE: Patent Policy issues... Carr, Wayne
• Re: Patent Policy issues... Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Patent Policy issues... Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 9 March 2012

• RE: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC Carr, Wayne
• Re: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC Jeff Jaffe

Wednesday, 7 March 2012

• RE: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC Carr, Wayne
• Re: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC Carr, Wayne
• Re: Patent Policy issues... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC Marcos Caceres
• html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC Carr, Wayne
• AW: What are the PD/PP constraints? [Was: Re: Request by AB] Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich

Tuesday, 6 March 2012

• Re: Patent Policy issues... Jeff Jaffe
• Re: Patent Policy issues... Arthur Barstow
• Patent Policy issues... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: What are the PD/PP constraints? [Was: Re: Request by AB] Arthur Barstow
• AW: What are the PD/PP constraints? [Was: Re: Request by AB] Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich

Monday, 5 March 2012

• Re: What are the PD/PP constraints? [Was: Re: Request by AB] Jeff Jaffe
• What are the PD/PP constraints? [Was: Re: Request by AB] Arthur Barstow
• Re: snapshots vs living standards Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: snapshots vs living standards Julian Reschke
• Re: snapshots vs living standards Karl Dubost
• Re: snapshots vs living standards Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: snapshots vs living standards Karl Dubost
• Re: snapshots vs living standards Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: snapshots vs living standards Olivier Thereaux
• Re: marking obsolete TRs - ISSUE-2 Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 3 March 2012

• Re: snapshots vs living standards Steve Faulkner
• Re: snapshots vs living standards Marcos Caceres
• Re: snapshots vs living standards Robin Berjon
• RE: snapshots vs. living standards Carr, Wayne

Friday, 2 March 2012

• Re: marking old TRs as obsolete - RE: "Living Standards" Philippe Le Hegaret
• snapshots vs living standards Philippe Le Hegaret

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 March 2012 01:45:55 UTC