- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:25:28 +0100
- To: "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>, "Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich" <k.scheppe@telekom.de>
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:00:26 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > Admittedly, I also tried to fill out the survey but didn't really get > it… so I stopped as I didn't want to add bad data :( Sorry Charles. It's complicated. The task of this group is complicated (the bit about getting results - the discussion is simple). So don't expect it to take 5 minutes to do a decent job Also, we can easily filter out your (or anyone's) data - as you'll see from the results: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/50503/CGPDconcerns/results (available to members of this community group) cheers > -- > Marcos Caceres > http://datadriven.com.au > > > On Friday, 23 March 2012 at 09:57, Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich wrote: > >> Filled out the survey. >> I found it somewhat difficult to decide whether the ranking means "I >> agree/disagree" or "like/dislike". >> >> I would suspect that numerically this survey might give some >> inconclusive results. >> >> Kai >> >> >> >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > Von: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:chaals@opera.com] >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. März 2012 15:24 >> > An: public-w3process@w3.org (mailto:public-w3process@w3.org) >> > Betreff: Survey: topics for W3C members to consider >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > There is a survey[1] available for this group (thanks Coralie), which >> I >> > would like people to complete. >> > >> > It seeks input on which topics from the list published by Steve Zilles >> > for >> > the Advisory Board[2] should be discussed by the W3C Members (the >> > people >> > who eventually decide on what changes they accept to the Process >> > Document, >> > and some other key things like Patent Policy). >> > >> > This is not the only form of input - several of us are monitoring this >> > list as well - but it is exactly the same questions that all W3C >> chairs >> > and AC representatives are being asked, so we can at least compare >> > easily >> > when building a preliminary agenda. >> > >> > The question asks how important is each of various topics to discuss, >> > and >> > there is a comment form where I suggest you put any comments or >> further >> > details for the given topics. >> > >> > If you are also an AC rep (e.g. me) or a chair (e.g. me) you don't >> need >> > to >> > fill it out multiple times, but forwarding a copy of what you said to >> > the >> > different groups might be helpful (I will do so for my answers). >> > Results >> > of the survey are available to participants in the group. >> > >> > [1] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/50503/CGPDconcerns/ >> > [2] >> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Mar/att- >> > 0007/AB_List_of_Concerns-20120306.htm >> > >> > cheers >> > >> > Chaals >> > >> > -- >> > Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group >> > je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk >> > http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com >> > > > -- Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 10:26:08 UTC