- From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:17:42 +0100
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, k.scheppe@telekom.de
- Cc: public-w3process@w3.org
- Message-ID: <op.wbe23sgw6ugkrk@giuseppep-x220>
Dear W3C Process Community Group chairs and participants, we (=Web&TV IG chairs and staff contacts) got a liaison letter (attached) from the Open IPTV Forum asking about how they should handle references to W3C specifications that are not yet Recommendations. The liaison letter lists a set of options (with pro/cons) and ask the W3C for advice on how to move forward and how this issue has been addressed in other cases. The Web and TV IG held a telco [2] and had some initial discussion on possible options. There was no consensus on how to deal with the issue but the following options (non mutually exclusive) were mentioned: 1. For all specs referenced by HTML5, indirectly reference them through html5 specification (to avoid inconsistencies in references and reduce the number of open ended references) 2. Reference dated snapshots 3. Reference a generic undated TF version (e.g. as done by EPUB) (note: the letter also list other options) In general, the IG participants felt that was important for the W3C to be looking into this problem (that is common to many organizations) and formulate some policy/best practices. That is why I'm fwd this to you. Do you have any recommendations on this topic or do you think having a general policy on this will be in scope of your CG? Regards, /g on behalf of the web&tv IG chairs [1] www.oipf.tv [2] http://www.w3.org/2012/03/12-webtv-minutes.html -- Giuseppe Pascale TV & Connected Devices Opera Software
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: stored
Received on Monday, 19 March 2012 12:18:22 UTC