public-swbp-wg@w3.org from February 2005 by date

Monday, 28 February 2005

• Re: Review of RDFTM Survey Natasha Noy
• [ALL] agenda (updated) Boston ftf Guus Schreiber
• RE: [SE] Comments on Draft Note Phil Tetlow
• Re: Verify Spam Messages Benjamin Nguyen
• Review of RDFTM Survey Steve Pepper
• [OEP][SE] Semantic Interoperability & Ontology Driven Architectures Jeff Pollock

Saturday, 26 February 2005

• Re: Verify Spam Messages Ralph R. Swick
• Re: Verify Spam Messages Christopher Welty
• Verify Spam Messages Uschold, Michael F
• [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note Uschold, Michael F
• [SE] Comments on Draft Note Uschold, Michael F
• [ALL] Minutes 24 Feb 2005 telecon 1800 UTC Libby Miller

Friday, 25 February 2005

• Spam filters Christopher Welty
• Re: [ALL] agenda Boston ftf 3-4 March Christopher Welty
• Re: [ALL] agenda Boston ftf 3-4 March Thomas Baker
• [ALL] agenda Boston ftf 3-4 March Guus Schreiber
• [PORT] Plan of action for SKOS Core Guide and Spec Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)
• RE: [WNET],[OEP] OntoWordNet. A new large OWL ontology Govoni, Darren
• RE: [WNET],[OEP] OntoWordNet. A new large OWL ontology Christopher Welty
• RE: [WNET],[OEP] OntoWordNet. A new large OWL ontology Govoni, Darren
• Re: New OEP editors drafts Alan Rector
• RE: [WNET],[OEP] OntoWordNet. A new large OWL ontology Aldo Gangemi
• New OEP editors drafts Christopher Welty

Thursday, 24 February 2005

• Re: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20050127/ Pat Hayes
• RE: [WNET],[OEP] OntoWordNet. A new large OWL ontology Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [SE] Updated Draft Editors Note Jeff Pan
• [WNET] Minutes of Telecon Wednesday 23rd Feb Aldo Gangemi
• RE: Spam:RE: [WNET],[OEP] OntoWordNet. A new large OWL ontology Govoni, Darren
• regrets for telecon 24th, Feb Govoni, Darren
• RE: [PORT] Which is the right list to discuss SKOS now? Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)
• RE: [WNET],[OEP] OntoWordNet. A new large OWL ontology Aldo Gangemi
• Regrets for today's telcon Lars Marius Garshol
• RE: [WNET],[OEP] OntoWordNet. A new large OWL ontology Uschold, Michael F
• Re: FTF final prepartions [was: [ALL] Agenda 24 Feb WG telecon] Ben Adida
• Re: Cancelling my F2F venue Ralph R. Swick
• Re: [SE] Updated Draft Editors Note Phil Tetlow
• Re: [PORT] Which is the right list to discuss SKOS now? Dan Brickley
• [PORT] TR: Subdivision of Concept Schemes Bernard Vatant
• [PORT] TR: Question on skos:subject domain Bernard Vatant
• [PORT] Which is the right list to discuss SKOS now? Bernard Vatant

Wednesday, 23 February 2005

• XML Ontology Creation Timothy Jaeger

Thursday, 24 February 2005

• Cancelling my F2F venue Benjamin Nguyen
• FTF final prepartions [was: [ALL] Agenda 24 Feb WG telecon] Guus Schreiber

Wednesday, 23 February 2005

• RE: [ALL] Agenda 24 Feb WG telecon Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 24 Feb WG telecon Dan Brickley
• [ALL] Agenda 24 Feb WG telecon Guus Schreiber
• RE: [WNET],[OEP] OntoWordNet. A new large OWL ontology Govoni, Darren
• RE: [WNET],[OEP] OntoWordNet. A new large OWL ontology Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [WNET],[OEP] OntoWordNet. A new large OWL ontology Uschold, Michael F
• [HTML] ftf - RDF/XHTML Task Force Liaison schedule Ben Adida
• [ADMIN] Fwd: monthly mailboxes of W3C list archives now available] Guus Schreiber
• RE: [WNET],[OEP] WordNet datamodel Dickinson, Ian John (HP Labs, Bristol, UK)
• RE: [WNET],[OEP] WordNet datamodel Aldo Gangemi
• RE: [WNET],[OEP] OntoWordNet. A new large OWL ontology Dickinson, Ian John (HP Labs, Bristol, UK)

Tuesday, 22 February 2005

• Re: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20050127/ Jeremy Carroll
• Regrets 24th Feb NANNI Marco RD-BIZZ-SOP
• re: [OEP] discussion on part note Christopher Welty
• Re: [SE] ODA Editors Draft - For Group Review Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [SE] ODA Editors Draft - For Group Review Phil Tetlow
• Re: [SE] ODA Editors Draft - For Group Review Jeremy Carroll
• Re: regrets 24th Feb Benjamin Nguyen
• Re: [SE] ODA Editors Draft - For Group Review Phil Tetlow
• Re: [SE] ODA Editors Draft - For Group Review Jeremy Carroll
• [SE] ODA Editors Draft - For Group Review Phil Tetlow

Friday, 18 February 2005

• Re: [OEP] Fwd: Re: discussion on part note Laure Vieu

Saturday, 19 February 2005

• fwd: ANN: Publication of SPARQL query language WD Dan Brickley

Friday, 18 February 2005

• comments on the Ontology Driven Architecture statement Bill McDaniel
• Re: [PORT] SKOS Core Guide to 1st WD - target is a WG Note Ralph R. Swick
• Re: SKOS Core review Re: issue: non-Literal "comment" properties Re: new draft of SKOS Core guide Dan Brickley
• Re: SKOS Core review Re: issue: non-Literal "comment" properties Re: new draft of SKOS Core guide Ralph R. Swick
• Re: telcon access during f2f Ralph R. Swick
• SKOS Core review Re: issue: non-Literal "comment" properties Re: new draft of SKOS Core guide Dan Brickley
• telcon access during f2f Christopher Welty
• Re: [PORT] SKOS Core Guide to 1st WD - target is a WG Note Dan Brickley
• [Fwd: Urgent: Deadline today for TP registration-- please ask group members to register] Guus Schreiber
• SKOS core vs guide subproperty problem (resend) Dan Brickley
• re: [OEP] discussion on part note Christopher Welty
• re: discussion on part note Alan Rector
• [OEP] Re: discussion on part note Aldo Gangemi
• [OEP] Fwd: Re: discussion on part note Aldo Gangemi
• [WNET] Telecon Wednesday 23rd Feb, 14:00 UTC Aldo Gangemi
• Re: March 3-4 F2F registered participants Alan Rector
• [RDFTM] Comments on draft survey Lars Marius Garshol
• RDFTM: Evaluation criteria Lars Marius Garshol
• [RDFTM] Draft survey - alternative location Steve Pepper
• [OEP] FW: discussion on part note Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [WNET] Please send info Aldo Gangemi

Thursday, 17 February 2005

• Re: [WNET] Synset IDs and fr relation Aldo Gangemi
• Re: March 3-4 F2F registered participants Deborah L. McGuinness
• March 3-4 F2F registered participants Ralph R. Swick
• [All] Urgent: Deadline today for TP registration-- please register by way of
• Re: comment: discussion of OWL n-ary constructs? Dan Connolly
• Re: [WNET] Telecon to restart TF Aldo Gangemi
• Re: comment: discussion of OWL n-ary constructs? Jeff Pan
• comment: pattern names, not numbers, please Dan Connolly
• comment: discussion of OWL n-ary constructs? Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 16 February 2005

• RE: [SE] Minutes of Telecon 15-Feb-2005 Uschold, Michael F
• [WNET] Telecon to restart TF Aldo Gangemi
• Re: [SE] Minutes of Telecon 15-Feb-2005 Phil Tetlow
• Re: [SE] Minutes of Telecon 15-Feb-2005 Jeremy Carroll
• regrets 24th Feb Jeremy Carroll
• Fw: [SE] Minutes of Telecon 15-Feb-2005 Jeff Pan
• Re: [SE] Minutes of Telecon 15-Feb-2005 Jeff Pan
• [WNET] MILE schema for lexical entries Aldo Gangemi
• [WNET] WordNet datamodel, version 3 Aldo Gangemi
• [WNET],[OEP] OntoWordNet. A new large OWL ontology Aldo Gangemi
• [WNET],[OEP] OntoWordNet. A new large OWL ontology Aldo Gangemi

Tuesday, 15 February 2005

• Re: [SE] Minutes of Telecon 15-Feb-2005 ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• [SE] Minutes of Telecon 15-Feb-2005 Phil Tetlow
• [SE] Agenda of the SETF telecon today Jeff Pan

Monday, 14 February 2005

• Re: [OEP]Re: A suggestion to the n-ary relation draft Christopher Welty
• Re: [PORT] SKOS Core Guide to 1st WD - target is a WG Note Ralph R. Swick
• Re: [PORT] SKOS Core Guide to 1st WD Ralph R. Swick
• [OEP]Re: A suggestion to the n-ary relation draft Jeff Pan
• Re: A suggestion to the n-ary relation draft Christopher Welty

Friday, 11 February 2005

• Re: issue: non-Literal "comment" properties Re: new draft of SKOS Core guide Dan Brickley
• [All] I'm Back David Wood
• Re: document publishing [was: [ALL] Agenda 10 Feb telecon 1800 UTC] Ralph R. Swick
• [ALL] Minutes 10 Feb telecon Thomas Baker

Thursday, 10 February 2005

• [ALL] IMPORTANT: ftf preparations and agenda outline Guus Schreiber
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 10 Feb telecon 1800 UTC Phil Tetlow
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 10 Feb telecon 1800 UTC Guus Schreiber
• RE: [ALL] Agenda 10 Feb telecon 1800 UTC McBride, Brian
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 10 Feb telecon 1800 UTC Phil Tetlow
• RE: [ALL] Agenda 10 Feb telecon 1800 UTC Gary Ng
• Re: ODM document -- n-ary relations Natasha Noy

Wednesday, 9 February 2005

• Regrets for 10 Feb Steve Pepper
• Re: ODM document -- n-ary relations Elisa F. Kendall
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 10 Feb telecon 1800 UTC Natasha Noy
• ODM document -- n-ary relations Natasha Noy
• RE: RE: [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability $swbpd Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 10 Feb telecon 1800 UTC Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 10 Feb telecon 1800 UTC -- possible regrets Benjamin Nguyen
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 10 Feb telecon 1800 UTC Dan Brickley
• Re: [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability Guus Schreiber
• [ALL] Agenda 10 Feb telecon 1800 UTC Guus Schreiber
• RE: [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability Bernard Vatant

Tuesday, 8 February 2005

• RE: [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability Christopher Welty
• [PORT] SKOS Core Guide to 1st WD Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)
• RE: [OEP] [SE] Logical vs Indexing - multiple Types Phil Tetlow
• RE: [OEP] [SE] Logical vs Indexing - multiple Types Bernard Vatant
• A suggestion to the n-ary relation draft Jeff Z. Pan
• Fwd: RE: [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability $swbpd Jim Hendler
• [WNET],[OEP],[PORT] Available Wordnet resources Aldo Gangemi
• Re: [OEP] [SE] Logical vs Indexing - multiple Types Alan Rector
• [OEP] [SE] Logical vs Indexing - multiple Types Bernard Vatant
• Re: [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability $swbpd Alan Rector
• Re: [OEP] review for n-ary relations draft Natasha Noy

Monday, 7 February 2005

• RE: ]OEP] update to the oep page describing the closing roles note Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability $swbpd Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability $swbpd Elisa F. Kendall
• RE: [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability $swbpd Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability $swbpd Deborah L. McGuinness
• RE: [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability $swbpd Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [OEP] review for n-ary relations draft Pat Hayes

Sunday, 6 February 2005

• Re: [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability Jim Hendler

Saturday, 5 February 2005

• Re: [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability Elisa F. Kendall
• [OEP] OWL and Semantic interoperability Uschold, Michael F

Friday, 4 February 2005

• [OEP] minutes of 2/3 telecon Christopher Welty
• RE: [WNET] WOrdnet Ontology McBride, Brian

Thursday, 3 February 2005

• [WNET] WOrdnet Ontology Uschold, Michael F
• ]OEP] update to the oep page describing the closing roles note Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: [OEP] Simple Part-Whole Relations - draft 1 Christopher Welty

Wednesday, 2 February 2005

• regrets 10th Feb Jeremy Carroll
• Re: General comments on XSCH Datatypes note Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [XSCH, ALL] some detailed comments from datatype note review Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Comp. Id schemes Phil Tetlow

Tuesday, 1 February 2005

• Re: [OEP] New draft of the note on n-ary relations Dan Brickley
• Re: [OEP] New draft of the note on n-ary relations Christopher Welty
• [SE] Today's telco protocol Daniel Oberle

Tuesday, 23 September 2003

• Fw: [SE] Brief Agenda for tomorrows telecon Phil Tetlow

Tuesday, 1 February 2005

• Re: [SE] Brief Agenda for tomorrows telecon Daniel Oberle

Last message date: Monday, 28 February 2005 22:54:59 UTC