- From: Uschold, Michael F <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:26:33 -0800
- To: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
I was googled on: [wordnet "owl lite"] and got to the Wordnet TaskForce page: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wordnet-sw-20040713.html My specific goal was to find out if wordnet171.owl was in Owl Lite or -DL or -Full. There already is at least one, and possible more WN ontologies in OWL already,e.g. the one at the knOWLer site. What is the rationale for the TF to produce another WN ontology in OWL. What are the issues with the existing ones? Thanks, Mike
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:27:07 UTC